Posted on December 16, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
So, this is truly the final post in my Ten Years of Rejectomancy series. As promised, I’m gonna give you ALL the numbers for each year and then a total of subs, rejections, and acceptances for the entire decade (plus the years before and this year). It’s been a blast to look back on the highs and lows of ten-plus years in the submission trenches, and I hope the journey has been inspiring, validating, and make a tad reassuring to those of you new to the submission grind. It’s tough, brutal at times, but if you keep at it, the acceptances do start piling up.
Okay, here’s the numbers for fourteen years of submissions. 🙂

So, in the ten official blog years, I managed 789 submissions and 105 acceptances. Not too bad, and good enough for 13.3% acceptance rate. I was over 15%, but 2023 and 2024 brought my career average down, and it looks like 2025 isn’t going to help much in that department either. Still, averaging ten acceptances per year is pretty solid, I think. You can see the pre-blog years and 2025 year-to-date (which may improve or worsen as I hear back on pending submissions), as well as an overall total for the 14 years I’ve been submitting short stories. I’m closing in on 1,000 submissions and 800 rejections, which are big milestones I should be celebrating in the first half of 2026.
I’d very much like to get back to double digit acceptances per year and push that acceptance percentage up to around 15% again. Things have gotten markedly tougher out there for a number of reasons. An inundation of AI subs at certain markets has increased wait times on submissions for one, and, sadly, there are just fewer speculative markets to submit to these days. I’m not complaining, mind you. You have to roll with the punches in this biz, but it is a noticeable downturn over the last couple of years. I guess it could simply be that I’m writing more garbage than I used to, but the number of final-round rejections I’ve been getting has actually increased, so as much as I’d like to believe I’m just getting worse in the ol’ writing department, that’s probably not true. 🙂
And there you have it, the entirety of my submission career and all ten years of the blog laid out in plain numbers. How’s your 2025 shaping up submissions-wise? I’d love to hear about it in the comments.
Finally, if you’ve missed any of my Ten Years of Rejectomancy posts and want to catch up, here are the links to all the others in the series.
Posted on December 8, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
Welp, here we are. Ten years of Rejectomancy. It’s been a long and bumpy road, and year ten certainly had its ups and downs, but it feels good to say I’ve been doing this for a decade, and I have no plans to stop. Our final year in this series is 2024, which was a definite improvement over 2023, though still short of satisfactory if I’m being honest. Things are getting tougher our there for a lot of reasons, but you gotta keep going, keep writing, and keep submitting.
Let’s have a look at Rejectomancy Year Ten.
Total stats for 2024.

Like I said, an improvement over 2023, but I wasn’t exactly setting the literary world alight with my submission efforts last year. Still, seeing that acceptance percentage crest 10% again certainly makes me feel a bit better. There are no queries in here (I learned my lesson there), and these are all short story subs or direct novel submissions to small publishers, which are close enough to submissions to count in my humble opinion. Sixty-eight subs is decent, though my goal is always to send at least a hundred (I did manage that in 2025, btw). If I’d been a tad more industrious, I might have hit double-digit acceptances, but what are you gonna do. I’d call this a decent enough rebound from a fairly disastrous 2023.
Here are my acceptances for 2024.

Seven acceptances in 2024, and most of them are to markets I’d sold to previously. The new market and one of my biggest short story sales to date is the sale to Ellery Queen Mystery Magazine. That’s a big one, and I’m looking forward to it coming out in the 2026 March/April issue of EQMM. Another thing you might notice in my sales here are that four of the seven are either crime fiction or crime/sci-fi. I’ve often thought that I might have better luck selling to straight crime/mystery markets, and I have fairly convincing sample size. I’m not ready to make the switch yet, but it’s something I think about.
And that’s Rejectomancy Year Ten, which brings us to a close (almost) in this blog series. It’s been fun looking back over the years and digging in to the highs and lows of my story submission career. I do plan on one more blog post to give you all the numbers for the entire ten years–subs, rejections, acceptances, etc.–so look for that in the coming weeks.
If you’ve missed any of my Ten Years of Rejectomancy posts and want to catch up, here are the links to the others in the series.
Thoughts or opinions about Rejectomancy Year Ten? Tell me about it in the comments.
Posted on November 24, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
Peaks and valleys. That’s the best way to describe the submission experience and my own meandering path as a writer. I’ve had some exceptional years where it felt like every story I submitted had a legit shot at publication, and then I’ve had years like 2023, where I thought, why the hell am I doing this again? Still, appearances can be deceiving, and what looks like one of my worst submission years ever is maybe a little more nuanced than that.
Let’s have a look at Rejectomancy Year Nine.
Total stats for 2023.

Oof, right? A paltry 4.2% acceptance rate is, well, not good. Now, I don’t shy away from owning my failures and terrible numbers, but this one time, I want to offer up an explanation for this massive drop in acceptance percentage. You see, in 2023, I started querying a novel, and I track my queries on another website called QueryTracker. Then I learned that Duotrope also lists agents, and I thought, hey, I should track my queries there, too. Obviously, I didn’t think that through, and well, this is the result.
So, of the 79 submissions I sent in 2023, 41 of them were actually queries for my novel Second Dawn. That means I only sent 38 short story submissions. So, with that number and the 5 acceptances I managed, my actual short story acceptance rate is 13%, which is more in line with my usual numbers. Still, it was my dumb ass that decided to track queries in the same place I track short stories, so I have to wear that 4.2% to some extent. 🙂
Here are my acceptances for 2023.

Just five acceptances in 2023, but they were all good sales. I sold my second story to Radon Journal, my third to Factor Four, and I had acceptances from new-to-me markets, Black Cat Weekly and Thirteen. Not too bad, especially when view through the prism of 38 submissions rather than 79.
And that’s Rejectomancy Year Nine. We’re getting close to the end of this series, so keep an eye out for Rejectomancy Year Ten – A Decade of Dejection. 😉
If you’ve missed any of my Ten Years of Rejectomancy posts and want to catch up, here are the links to the others in the series.
Thoughts or opinions about Rejectomancy Year Nine? Tell me about it in the comments.
Posted on October 31, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
Today on The Daily NO, we’re celebrating Halloween by looking at all the rejections I’ve received on the spookiest day of the year. However, to my shock and surprise, in over 12 years and nearly 1,000 submissions, I have received exactly ONE rejection on October 31st. The only reason I can come up with for this bizarre anomaly is that I submit to a lot of horror markets, and, well, it makes sense that horror editors are not working on horror’s holiday. 🙂
Anyway, let’s take a look at my Halloween rejection.
Halloween Rejection
Hey Aeryn,
As personal rejections go, this one is short and to the point. It’s almost like a form letter in its brevity, which is fine with me. It simply says they liked the story, but it didn’t make the cut. This was for an anthology called Campfire Macabre, so I’m sure spots were limited. There’s no feedback here, so it’s important not to read into a rejection like this. They could have passed on it for a dozen reasons. They might have accepted another story with a similar theme, they might have needed something longer or shorter to fill out the anthology, or, hell, they might have just liked another story a little better.
This rejection did tell me I had a good story on my hands. This was the fourth personal or close-but-no-cigar rejection “Things That Grow” received, and I sold it on its next submission to The Flame Tree Fiction Newsletter. The takeaway here is if your story is getting rejections like this, it’s probably not a matter of quality; it’s more about putting that story in front of the right editor.
Thoughts on this rejection? Tell me about it in the comments.
Posted on October 28, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
Although 2021 wasn’t a terrible year for submissions, I definitely went into 2022 hoping to improve, and in some ways I did. Mostly, though, I kind of held course with a solid but not exceptional year. There’s nothing wrong with that, but it was definitely one of those years where I felt like I was just treading water in a lot of ways. (Spoiler alert: 2023 will show me the error of this thinking.)
Okay, let’s have a look at Rejectomancy Year Eight.
Total stats for 2022.

Although I didn’t hit the vaunted 100 submissions mark in 2022, I still sent out a respectable number of stories. Also, my acceptance percentage improved quite a bit over the year before, jumping from 9.6 to 15.2. That ain’t bad. I was also paid more than double for the stories I sold in 2022 over those I sold in 2021. The money I make from shorts is not anything I rely on, but it’s always good to get paid. Looking at it now, three years later, I likely misjudged this year. It’s better than I gave it credit for.
Here are my acceptances for 2022.

I sold 11 stories in 2022, though one of the stories was actually a novella, Effectively Wild, that I sold to Grinning Skull Press. Most of my other sales were to pro or semi-pro-paying markets, though there’s a bittersweet sale in here. The story “Where the Bodies are Buried” is the last story The Arcanist published before going on indefinite hiatus. Fun fact, my story “Cowtown” was the first story they published back in 2017, so I bookended the publishing run of that market. God, I miss those folks.
The other positive here is that four of the stories I sold where new-to-me markets, which is always great, and one of them, Radon Journal, has become one of my absolute favorite publishers on the planet. I’ve since sold them three more stories, and I’m quite active on the Discord server. I also managed two sales to Factor Four Magazine, another market that has become one of my go-to’s for flash fiction.
And that’s Rejectomancy Year Eight. Not bad, not great, but serviceable. Again, spoiler alert, in 2023, I will definitely look back on this “mediocre” year and realize how good I actually had it. 🙂
If you’ve missed any of my Ten Years of Rejectomancy posts and want to catch up, here are the links to the others in the series.
Thoughts or opinions about Rejectomancy Year Eight? Tell me about it in the comments.
Posted on October 22, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
I’m a car and motorcycle enthusiast, and one of my favorite bits of (now outdated) slang is “hitting the ton”, which means going over 100 miles per hour (usually on a motorcycle). For me, there’s a literary version of hitting the ton, too, and that’s getting 100 or more submission in a calendar year, something I achieved for the third time in my career a few days ago. So, I thought I’d do a little post about it and talk about what it takes to hit the ton. 🙂
First, lets look at the stats.

So, as you can see from the screenshot I just took from Duotrope, I’m still sitting at exactly 100 submissions, and here’s how that 100 subs breaks down.
It’s been a tough year, and my acceptance percentage, though not terrible at just under 11%, is not where I’d like it to be. Lots of close-but-no-cigar rejections. Still, it could be worse, and the bright spot is that I’ve managed to break through with some prominent markets, including Ellery Queen Mystery Magazine and Abyss & Apex. I also still have 21 subs pending, and there might be another pro sale or two in the mix. If I can end the year with around a dozen acceptances, all of them paid, and half of them at pro markets, I’d be satisfied.
Now let’s talk about what it takes to hit 100 subs (or more) in a year.
And that’s how I got to 100 submissions this year. My record is 120, and with two months and change to go, I might be able to beat that. Another, loftier goal I’d like to hit is 1,000 submission since I started tracking them on Duotrope back in 2012. I need 55 for that, though, so unless I find some boundless reservoir of writing energy between now and the new year, that’s probably unlikely.
How’re your submission going? Closing in on any personal goals? Tell me about it in the comments.
Posted on September 24, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
There’s a phenomena in baseball and other professional sports where a player, usually a rookie, has a fantastic inaugural season, goes into the next season with massive expectations, and then, well, puts up mediocre numbers to huge surprise and disappointment. This is often called a sophomore slump, but I’ve always thought of it as the whiplash effect. It’s so hard to be at the top of your game on a consistent basis, largely because there’s a fair amount of luck involved in that kind of success, so regression is almost inevitable. When it happens, it can shake you up, make you doubt yourself, and wonder if your success was just a fluke. That’s what 2021 and year seven of necromancy was for me. Not a terrible year, but compared to the lofty heights of 2020, certainly a disappointment.
So, let’s have a look at Rejectomancy Year Seven.
Total stats for 2021.

I was definitely productive in 2021, and it was the third time in my career that I exceeded 100 submissions in a year. The other results, however, were not so great. I managed a fairly meager sub 10% acceptance rate, less than half what I achieved the year before. I did make a fair number of sales, and even a few pro sales, but I struggled to sell anything longer than flash, which I’ll detail a bit more below. I wouldn’t call 2021 a bad year, but it was certainly a disappointing year.
Here are all my acceptances for 2021.

I landed 12 total acceptances in 2021, and if you look, you’ll see a lot of my usual suspects. Three stories to The Arcanist, two to Flash Point SF, and a smattering to other markets I’d sold to before and continue to sell to today. The new kids on the block were Wyldblood and Shotgun Honey, and 2021 marked my first acceptances with these markets. So, not a bad a year in terms of sales, but it was a struggle year, and let me see if I can explain why.
Twelve sales out of 102 submissions isn’t awful, but I can definitely remember struggling in 2021. As I look back at my submission record, it’s easy to see why. A lot of close-but-no-cigar submissions, and often for the same story. For example, “The Downer”, which I eventually sold to On Spec, received 16 rejections before that sale, many of them in 2021. Another story, “When Gods Walk” racked up 13 rejections before I sold it to Radon Journal in 2023. It, too, received many of these rejections in 2021. The list goes on, and it seemed to be a year of getting close, but not close enough. Timing is a big deal in this business, and selling a story is all about right time, right publisher, right editor. I just couldn’t line all those tumblers up in 2021.
And that’s Rejectomancy Year Seven. Quite the let down from year six, but overall not a bad year, and a far cry from my worst. THAT year is looming on the horizon, and we’ll get to it soon. 🙂
If you’ve missed any of my Ten Years of Rejectomancy posts and want to catch up, here are the links to the others in the series.
Thoughts or opinions about Rejectomancy Year Seven? Tell me about it in the comments.
Posted on September 18, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
When I set out to write this series, I knew I’d be writing openly and honestly about the ups and downs of the publishing business as well as the grueling grind of submitting short stories. As such, I’ve detailed decent years, disappointing years, and, yeah, even a bona fide good years. Today, I get to write about something even better, a stellar year, my best submissions year ever in the decade and change I’ve been doing this.
So, let’s jump into Rejectomancy Year Six.
Total stats for 2020.

So, as you can see, 2020 was a all kinds of good. I sent a solid number of submissions, and I managed an acceptance percentage over 21%. That’s pretty hard to do, and I was and am damn proud of my hit rate in that year. I also made a decent amount of money on short story sales, and while it’s not the kind of cash that you can make a living on, it ain’t bad for publishing flash and shorts in the SFFH market. If I hadn’t already been an SFWA member, I would have qualified for a full membership off this year alone. So, you know, not too shabby.
And here are all my acceptances for 2020.

I scored 17 acceptances in 2020, one less than than the 18 I scored in 2018, which remains my personal record. That said, the quality of acceptances in 2020 was much better than 2018. Eleven of my seventeen acceptances were to pro-paying markets, and there’s a first place flash contest win in the mix as well that netted me 300 bucks. Not bad.
In addition to the acceptances, I got a lot of close-but-no-cigar rejections from pro markets. It was already a great year, but I can’t help but feel that I was a stone’s-throw away from something truly epic. This is not to say that I look back on 2020 with any kind of regret. If I could put this year on repeat from now until the end of my career, I would absolutely do it.
Again, you’ll notice that many of the markets I sold stories too just five years ago have closed, gone on indefinite hiatus, or, in the case of Dark Matter, stopped publishing a periodical to focus on books and anthologies. This is, unfortunately, just an indicator of how hard it is to publish and sustain a magazine or journal. Something that’s only gotten more difficult in the past few years.
And that’s Rejectomancy Year Six. We have climbed to the peak of my personal submissions mountain, and though I will have some decent years to come, I haven’t been able to quite reach the heights I attained in 2020. This year, for instance, has been okay, but we’re in no danger of using words like “best” or “greatest” or “stellar.” 🙂
If you’ve missed any of my Ten Years of Rejectomancy posts and want to catch up, here are the links to the others in the series.
Thoughts or opinions about Rejectomancy Year Six? Tell me about it in the comments.
Posted on September 10, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
I set a lot of personal submission records in 2018 (year four), and though year five wasn’t nearly as good, I maintained both a solid number of submissions and a respectable number of acceptances. In other words, I was consistent, and that’s not a bad way to be in the grueling and often cruel world of publishing. This is not to say there wasn’t some regression, but it’s the kind I can live with. Anyway, let’s take a look at Rejectomancy year five.
Total stats for 2019.

After the banner year of 2018, I was expecting more of the same in 2019. Unfortunately, it was not to be. This is not to say that 2019 was an awful year–far from it–but it was definitely a step back in terms of number of submissions and the number of pro sales. The number of submissions I made was solid, and I did manage an acceptance percentage of a tad over 14%, which is respectable. So, in all, a decent but not exemplarily year of submissions.
Let’s take a look at the acceptances for 2019 and see what they tell us.

I managed 13 acceptances in 2019, and while that’s not too bad, there’s only two pro sales in the bunch. The rest are semi-pro and even token/non-paying. Looking at my overall submissions for the year, the thing that jumps out at me is that, well, I was submitting a number of stories that I’ve since retired because they weren’t good enough. In addition, two of the acceptances, “The Back-Off” and “Paint-Eater” took me a LONG time to sell, despite them both being pretty good stories. Each racked up over 15 rejections. Of course, there are some bright spots here. I sold my first story to On Spec, which is a fantastic semi-pro Canadian market. I’d go on to sell them another of my hard-to-place stories a few years later.
You may notice once anomaly in my acceptance list, and that’s the sale to The Bronzeville Bee, a market that’s marked REMOVED and closed down shorty after I received an acceptance from them. I left it as an acceptance (because it was), though I maybe should change it to lost/returned now. I’d go on to sell that story for reals to MetaStellar, a much better market that actually still exists. 🙂
And that’s Rejectomancy Year Five. Not bad, but definitely a step back when compared to the prior year. I did write two novels in 2019, so I was pretty productive, and as it turned out, 2019 was simply the lull before the storm. The following year I would have my best submissions year EVER. Stay tuned for that. 🙂
Thoughts or opinions about Rejectomancy Year Five? Tell me about it in the comments.
Posted on September 5, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
Today on The Daily NO, we’re going to look at the first rejection I received for a story that would go on to collect a record-setting (for me) 25 rejections before I sold it. This is definitely a case of sticking with a story you believe in, even when the NOs start really piling up.
Okay, let’s take a look.
Rejection #7
Thank you for allowing us to read your story, When Stars Fall, submitted to the General Submission Window submission window on 8/10/2021.
Thank you for being patient while we held your story, but we did not choose it for the lineup. Any story in the hold pile was one that we would have been happy to publish, but we didn’t have the resources to publish all of the stories that we liked and we have to make some hard choices. We hope you find a publisher for it, and that you will submit again in the next submission window.
While we don’t always offer comments on stories, this time we did. The following comments are meant to be helpful; if you disagree with the comments, then you should feel free to disregard.
[Editor] said: I appreciated the clear character motivations and the dinosaur hunting action. Though I like epistolary formats I did wonder if that was the best choice here where the journal is presumably going to be destroyed very soon after. Readers generally liked the action and the ideas here.
Some readers had some plausibility questions about it. In the lack of survival gear, the oddity of having to continue hunting them with modern science it would probably be synthesized once found (though that could be handwaved away), and wondering how they prevent “butterfly effects” causing major changes to the future.
Readers said, in part:
* Whoa, this one was extremely good. I felt connected to the character and a little sadness at what his motivations were, but also loved the world building. The prose came alive to me and made me really absorbed in it. Excellent story.
As rejections go, they don’t get much better than this, and I would expect nothing less from a market as professional and well respected (deservedly so) as Diabolical Plots. The rejection starts out with the usual boilerplate business, informing me that though they liked the story, they’re not able to publish it. Then the editor goes on to talk about a few issues he and some of the readers had with the story, as well as imparting some of the things the readers liked about the piece. Everything is delivered in a constructive, helpful way, all with the preface of “if you don’t agree, please feel free to disregard.” I know that doesn’t seem like much, but I do appreciate it when editors couch their comments in the frame of opinion, even if that opinion is a very well informed one, as it absolutely is here. The last bit where the editor includes what is essentially just praise for the story is just a damn classy thing to do, and it both softened the blow of the rejection and sent me away feeling like I would eventually find this piece a home.
My grade for this rejection. Five stars. A+. No notes.
I did take some of the feedback here to heart and made revisions to the story. Specifically, I addressed the lack of survival gear, the potential butterfly effects of time travel, and how the journal would survive. These changes definitely improved the piece, and I think helped eventually sell it.
This rejection, with all its praise and constructive feedback, gave me the confidence to keep submitting the story. It continued to rack up personal rejections like this from pro markets, but that just further fueled my persistence. I sold it to Abyss & Apex Magazine last month, and though it took me almost four years to find this story a home, I’m glad I kept with it.
The lesson here is simple. If you believe in a story and it’s getting the kind of rejections you see above, stick with it, maybe a make a few revisions, and keep firing it out there. There’s a very good chance an acceptance is around the corner . . . or you know, a few corners. 😉
Thoughts on this rejection? Tell me about it in the comments.
