Posted on May 5, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
April was a slightly better month than March, but though I made decent headway on a number of writing goals, it was still largely a disappointing month.
I sent twelve submissions in April, which gave me a total of fifty-two for the year. That works out to an average of thirteen submissions a month, and puts me on pace for 156 by year’s end. That’s right on target, and even leaves me a little wiggle room if I have a slow submission month.
Eleven rejections is about average for the amount of submission I’m sending. In my experience, rejections tend come in waves, so I figure there’ll be double-digit months and months where I see as few as five or six. April, like March, saw a number the rejections of the 100-plus-day, final-round variety, i.e., heartbreakers. Despite some success, these rejections that cast a pall of disappointment over the entire month, but, you know, that’s the gig.
I did manage to sell a story in April and to a pro market to boot, so it’s not all bad news. I’m still behind when it comes to my acceptance goals, but there’s still time to make up ground in the coming months.
At some point, I knew my story-a-week goal was going to get tough, and I reached that point in April. I only wrote two new stories last month, which gives me fifteen (out of eighteen weeks). So I’m three off my pace. I might be able to catch up in the coming months by writing multiple stories in a week (especially if they’re flash), but I’m not going to worry too much about it. If I end up writing only 45-plus new stories by the end of the year, that’s still pretty damn good.
Eleven rejections in March.
Like March, April featured too many final-round, close-but-no-cigar rejections. Two were from pro markets and had 145-plus-day wait times. The last one was from a good semi-pro and came quite a bit quicker, after only 75 days. I don’t want to read too much into these rejections, but it does feel like I’m getting a lot more of them than I used to. Now, some of that could be just luck of the draw, but after talking to some writer pals who are also in the submission trenches, there’s a general sense that it’s gotten a bit tougher to break through than in years past. That’s anecdotal, of course, and I might get three acceptances in May that completely change my tune, but right now it does feel pretty damn challenging out there.
Like I did last month, I’ll share a couple of the heartbreaker rejections with ya.
Heartbreaker Rejection 1
Thank you for submitting [story] to [publisher]. We very much appreciate the chance to read your work, but we are regretfully saying no to this submission. We wish you luck with placing it elsewhere and hope you will continue to consider us in the future.
This was a tough one. It came from a professional market after a further consideration letter and a 154-day wait. The rejection is a simple form rejection, which isn’t that unusual even after a further consideration and a long wait. Like always, I’m not upset at the publisher or editor or anything silly like that. This kind of outcome is just a reality of submitting short stories, but like I said in my intro, there have been a lot of these lately, and I’m not to proud to admit they can take a mental toll on even a veteran rejectomancer. 😉
Heartbreaker Rejection 2
Many thanks for your interest in this anthology, and your patience while final selections were made. This is the sixth book in a collaborative series of annual horror anthologies with [editor], and we have enjoyed reading through the stories that were sent in for consideration. We received over 900 submissions in response to this call, which made the final decisions especially tough as [editor] was again only able to choose 4 stories for publication from this route.
I’m afraid we won’t be going ahead with your work this time, though we look forward to seeing more stories from you in future. If you’d be interested in submitting to us again please watch out for opportunities via our newsletter, website and social media pages.
Although this was certainly a heartbreaker rejection because it came after 149 days and was, as the rejections stated, part of final selections, the reason I’m posting it is not to elicit sympathy (that’s what the first one’s for), but to showcase the kind of odds you’re often up against when submitting stories to magazines and anthologies. In this case, only four stories were chosen out of 900 submissions. For the math nerds, that’s a miniscule 0.44%. Tough to break through with that kind of odds, but still worth trying.
Once more, here’s my writing goals bingo card after another full month of submissions.

I really would have liked to have filled in one of the acceptance goals, but I fell just short of both the first overall acceptance and pro acceptance marks. Hopefully, May will allow me to add a bit more green to my bingo card.
And that was April. May goals are the same: write more, submit more, and hopefully, get accepted more.
That was my month. How was yours?
Posted on April 4, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
To put it bluntly, March was a brutal month, but I did make some positive yardage. All of my trials, tribulations, and so, so many rejections below. 🙂
I sent fourteen submissions last month, which gives me a total of forty for the year. I sent out another two this morning, so I’m technically up to forty-two. The goal is 150 subs for 2025, and I’m on pace with an average of about thirteen per month. I’m also on pace for hitting a secondary goal of 1,000 total submissions since I started recording my subs on Duotrope back in 2012. If I keep up the level of writing and submitting I maintained in the first quarter of the year, I should hit both goals.
The eleven rejections I received is not an overwhelming amount, especially for how many submissions I’m sending, but the fact that so many of them were close-but-no-cigar, final-round rejections from pro markets made for a tough month. More on that in the rejections section of this post.
I managed to write another four stories, which isn’t too bad as I was on vacation for over a week. That gives me a seventeen for the first quarter or roughly five stories per month. My goal is fifty-two stories for the year, and I’m well on my way to that mark. I’ve already finished the first story for April, so the second quarter is off to a good start, too.
Eleven rejections in March.
So, the big story here are the CBNC rejections, and I got a bunch of them last month. These kinds of rejections are especially tough because you know the story is good enough to get published, just not good enough this time. It comes with territory, and you just have to roll with it, but CBNCs do sting a bit more than your usual no. I’ll share a couple of my heartbreakers below. Keep in mind, this is not me calling out editors for rejecting me. That’s stupid and immature. As usual, this is just me pulling back the curtain a bit on how tough the writing industry can be sometimes.
Heartbreaker Rejection 1
I’m sorry to say that [publisher] will not be purchasing [story] for an upcoming issue. We received an overwhelming number of excellent pieces during this submissions period, and were ultimately able to choose fewer than 1% of them for publication.
Our longlist was made up of our favourite pieces, and yours was certainly among them. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to read your work. We’re grateful for the chance, and we wish you all the best in placing this elsewhere.
This rejection came after 146 days and a further consideration letter from a great pro market. I REALLY wanted this one, but it wasn’t in the cards this time. Still, as with all CBNC rejections, you have to look at the bright side. One, the story is definitely good enough to get published, and two, I know what kinds of stories to send this market so that next time, I might make the cut.
Heartbreaker Rejection 2
Thank you for submitting [story] to [publisher]. Unfortunately we have decided not to accept it for publication. I appreciate your patience with waiting for a final response, and best wishes with finding a home for this piece elsewhere.
The email subject line for this rejection was “Final round rejection / [story title] / [publisher]”, and I appreciate that. If I’m gonna get rejected, I’d rather the proverbial Band-Aid was ripped off quickly. This is a very cool new market, and I almost made their first issue. The only downside is they have a pretty specific theme, and I had just the one story that fit. So, if I submit again, I’ll need to write something specifically for their theme, which is certainly doable, and maybe even advisable seeing how close I got here.
The bingo card below breaks up my primary goals into 25 bite-size mini goals, and this month I get to mark another one complete.

I would have liked to have filled in one of the acceptance or new story goals, but I’ll take the first rejections goal, too. Hopefully, April will be a better month, and I can claim some more positive yardage.
And that was March. My goals for April are simply to write and submit more stories, and, hopefully, get a few of those stories accepted.
That was my month. How was yours?
Posted on March 21, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
Time for another path to publication, wherein I recount the long and painful journey of a story from creation to that vaunted state of publication. This time, we’ll be looking at “The Downer”, a spec-fic piece that I thought was an absolute slam dunk when I finished it and turned out to be a two-year, sixteen-submission death march that had me questioning my talent, my submissions targeting skills, and even my sanity by the end. Before we get into all the rejections and whatnot, let me tell you a little bit about the story.
Back in early 2020, I was vacationing in Hawaii, and one night I had a very vivid dream about a young woman who generated a kind of misfortune field, so that everyone who spent too much time around her would eventually suffer some kind of terrible accident. Now, I don’t generally dream that vividly, and even when I do, my dreams are a bunch of jumbled nonsense that are basically just manifestation of the brain weasels that chew on my gray matter every day. This time, however, I woke knowing I had a hell of a story idea, so I jotted down some notes, and when I got back home, I started writing. I decided to write the story as an epistolary, a decision that would later haunt me during the submission process. At the time, writing a story that was essentially a written job interview for the FBI seemed like the perfect fit for the character and the idea, but as you’ll see, it might have worked against me.
So, let’s dive into the submission data. I’m going to name each of the markets I submitted this work to just as a matter of record, but, please, do not misread that as me taking any of these publishers to task for not accepting the story. My intention here is not to point out publishers who “missed out” on my brilliant work (hah!); it’s simply to showcase how difficult it is sometimes to get a story published. Remember, it’s all about the right fit, and sometimes finding that fit can, well, give you fits (sorry).
| Submission | Market | Date Sent | Days Out | Result |
| 1 | The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction (F&SF) | 1/31/20 | 1 | Rejection (Personal) |
| 2 | Escape Pod | 4/1/20 | 6 | Rejection (Personal) |
| 3 | Clarkesworld: Science Fiction & Fantasy Magazine | 4/7/20 | 8 | Rejection (Form) |
| 4 | Asimov’s Science Fiction | 4/15/20 | 1 | Rejection (Form) |
| 5 | The Dark Magazine | 4/16/20 | 0 | Rejection (Form) |
| 6 | Cossmass Infinities | 4/17/20 | 95 | Rejection (Form) |
| 7 | Strange Horizons | 7/21/20 | 63 | Rejection (Form) |
| 8 | Apex | 9/22/20 | 76 | Rejection (Form, Shortlisted) |
| 9 | Diabolical Plots | 1/1/21 | 3 | Rejection (Form) |
| 10 | Black Static | 1/4/21 | 1 | Rejection (Form) |
| 11 | Lightspeed Magazine | 2/8/21 | 31 | Rejection (Form) |
| 12 | Pulp Literature | 3/11/21 | 41 | Rejection (Form) |
| 13 | Lamplight | 3/16/21 | 28 | Rejection (Form) |
| 14 | Uncharted Magazine | 4/18/21 | 52 | Rejection (Form) |
| 15 | Boneyard Soup Magazine | 6/9/21 | 115 | Rejection (Form) |
| 16 | On Spec | 9/26/21 | 126 | Accepted |
As you can see, “The Downer” was definitely put through its paces in the submission process, and though I ended up selling it to a damn good market, getting there was trying at times. Now, some of this is simply luck of the draw. Had On Spec been open to submissions earlier than it was, I might have submitted it there far sooner than I did, and, who knows, maybe I would have saved myself ten rejections or so. Of course, that’s just part of the whole process. You have to put the right story in front of the right editor at the right time. Sometimes you do that on the first submissions and sometimes you do it on the sixteenth.
I think there were maybe a couple of other things working against this story as well. One, like many of my pieces, it’s kind of a mishmash of horror, fantasy, and science fiction, and doesn’t fit neatly into any of those genres. That can make it somewhat hard to sell to markets that specialize in one genre or the other. The fact I sold it to a general spec-fic market kind of supports this theory, but it’s still mostly conjecture, though it’s something I’ve long suspected about certain pieces of mine.
I think what really held the story back, though, is something for which I do have some concrete data. The fact that it’s an epistolary very likely hurt its chances somewhat. I’ll offer up two pieces of evidence for that theory. The first come from the rejection I received from F&SF.
Thank you for giving me a chance to read “The Downer.” I thought this was an interesting character and premise, but the narrative did not persuade me that the epistolary format was the best way to tell/show this story at this length. (I see the appeal of the epistolary format here, particularly in setting up the narrative arc for the turn/reveal at the end; it just didn’t work for me. Part of that may be that I’ve answered mail for a number of high level executives, including a CEO and an executive vice president, and I pretty much answer mail all day now, and nobody who reads mail for someone important or for themselves would get to page 2 of this without skimming and putting it aside: so it might be me more than the story.) I’m going to pass on this story for Fantasy & Science Fiction, but I wish you best of luck finding the right market for it and hope that you’ll keep us in mind in the future.
In the meantime, we all hope you are doing well and staying healthy.
Best regards,
Charlie
It’s always great to get a personal note and some feedback from an editor as great as C.C. Finlay, and he makes an excellent point about the story, especially given his personal experience. Note, I don’t think that Charlie is prejudiced against epistolary stories in general, just that the format didn’t work for him here, and I appreciated that he explained why it didn’t. Unfortunately, I had a 5,000-word epistolary story already written, and since this was the story’s first rejection, I decided to soldier on, and keep submitting it as is. With hindsight being 20/20, and knowing that this would be the first of fourteen rejections, I think there’s an argument to be made that I should have taken the idea and character, which did work, scrapped the story, and rewritten it in a standard third-person limited POV or something of that nature.
Now, as for the other piece of evidence that the epistolary format might have hurt this story, well, it comes from an unexpected place, a rejection for another story from On Spec, the same market that accepted “The Downer.” When you get a close-but-no-cigar rejection from On Spec, they, like many publishers, will include some of the first reader feedback. Well, the rejected story was also an epistolary tale, and two of their readers expressed an issue with the format, one even saying that “we don’t generally like [epistolary] tales”. Now, obviously, I did manage to sell On Spec an epistolary story, so those readers obviously thought it was good enough despite the format. Again, let me stress that I have no animosity or resentment toward ANY editor or reader that rejected this story or any other for any reason. Editorial (or first reader) taste is a thing, and it can often be the difference between an acceptance and a rejection.
Now, did any of the markets pass on “The Downer” because it was an epistolary? Maybe. They might have had similar objections to those of C. C. Finlay, and simply felt that the format was the wrong one for this story but not the wrong format for any story. I’ll never know, and I am, of course, engaging in a bit of rejectomancy here, but, hey, it IS the name of the blog. 🙂
Anyway, I sold “The Downer” to On Spec on January 30th, 2022, and it was published in issue #123. It was my second sale to On Spec. They’ve also published another one of my oft-rejected stories, “The Back-Off” (bless them), another double-digit rejectee that will likely be the subject of a future path to publication post.
And there you have it, another arduous tale of submissions, rejections, and eventual acceptance triumph. Questions about the piece and it’s twisting path to publication? Or, do you have a tale of your own about an oft-rejected story that eventually found a home? I’d love to hear about either in the comments.
Posted on March 18, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
Last week, I hit another significant submission milestone. I received my 700th rejection since I started tracking them on Duotrope back in 2012. If you’ve been following my blog for any length of time, you know that when I hit a big round number like this, I like to take a deep dive into the stats and see what they can tell me. So, let’s do that. 🙂
First up, let’s establish exactly how long I’ve been tracking all these no’s, not for us’s, and we’re gonna pass’s.
The first rejection I entered into Duotrope came on May 5th, 2012. The rejected story was “Feeding Time” and the rejecting market was Daily Science Fiction. The story was okay, and I did shop it around a bit after that, but I never found a home for it, and it now resides in the digital trunk where just-okay stories go to die. The market, Daily Science Fiction, is now sadly on indefinite hiatus, and was a market I tried unsuccessfully to crack for over a decade.Â
The last rejection, number 700, I received on March 16th, 2025. The story is a new one called “Love in the Time of Giardia” and it was rejected on it’s maiden submission by The Colored Lens. It’s a weird little story that I might struggle to place, but The Colored Lens had some good feedback, so I’ll look to revise this piece and keep trying.
Now let’s look at how many distinct stories I’ve had rejected and from how many markets.Â
Stories: I’ve had 159 distinct stories rejected. Of those 159, I’ve gone on to sell 76 of them, so roughly half. Additionally, fifteen of the rejected stories are out on currently out on submission, and five of them are currently being held for further consideration. So, I like my chances for finding homes for some of these oft-rejected stories. Currently, my most rejected stories, each with twenty-five total, are “Set in Stone” and “Time Has No Memory”. I’ve retired “Set in Stone” but “Time Has No Memory” has received half-a-dozen close-but-no-cigar rejections, and I believe I’ll eventually find it a home (I hope). Just for funsies here are my top ten most-rejected stories.
| Story | Rejections | Published? |
| Hell to Pay – Installment Plans Available! | 12 | Yes |
| Coffin Shopping | 13 | |
| Caroline | 15 | Yes |
| The Downer | 16 | Yes |
| The Scars You Keep | 16 | Yes |
| Trapping Disaster | 17 | |
| Paper Cut | 18 | Yes |
| Signs and Wonders | 18 | |
| Set in Stone | 25 | |
| Time Has No Memory | 25 |
As you can see, I’ve managed to sell five of my ten most-rejected pieces, and by the number of hold letters and close-but-no-cigar rejections received by “Trapping Disaster”, “Signs and Wonders”, and “Time Has No Memory”, I think I’ll eventually sell them as well. “Coffin Shopping” is a maybe. It’s a good story, but it’s setting and subject make it a hard sell. “Set in Stone” is a piece of what you might call juvenilia (I wrote it a long time ago), and it’s just not good enough for prime time; it’ll stay in the trunk where it belongs.
Markets: I have had the pleasure, nay the privilege, of getting rejected by 180 distinct markets. Many of these markets have since published my work, but I’m still knocking at the door of many more, especially some of the most vaunted pro outfits. Of my nineteen currently pending submissions, thirteen of them are with markets I’ve yet to publish with. Five of those thirteen submissions have been held for further consideration, so, you know, fingers crossed. Again, for shits and giggles, here are the ten markets that have rejected me the most.
| Publisher | Rejections | Acceptances |
| The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction (F&SF)Â | 17 | 0 |
| Flame Tree Press | 20 | 5 |
| Factor Four Magazine | 21 | 4 |
| The Dark Magazine | 21 | 0 |
| Daily Science Fiction | 24 | 0 |
| NewMyths.com | 24 | 1 |
| Apex Magazine | 26 | 0 |
| The Arcanist | 31 | 16 |
| Flash Fiction Online | 38 | 0 |
| The Molotov Cocktail | 52 | 17 |
For simplicity’s sake, I’ve combined all of a publisher’s individual journals, contests, anthologies, and other projects under a single listing. So, for example, Flame Tree Press includes the Flame Tree Fiction Newsletter and all their various anthologies. Like my most-rejected stories, I’ve managed to crack five of my most-rejected markets. I’ve gotten very close with Flash Fiction Online, making it to their final round of deliberation a handful of times. I’ve made it out of the slush pile with Apex, but not much further. I like my chances of eventually cracking those two, and I’ll keep trying. Of course, my chances of appearing in the pages (digital or print) of The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction or Daily Science Fiction are pretty much zero at this point because both are on hiatus. Sadly, The Arcanist, which used to be my go-to for slightly humorous spec-fic stories, is also on indefinite hiatus.
I used to keep careful track of the type of rejections I received, even going so far as to separate form rejection into standard and higher-tier, but I’ve stopped doing that. It’s not that I don’t believe that higher-tier form rejections exist–they do–it’s just often difficult to tell which is which, and, in the grand scheme of things, I’m not sure it matters that much. Now, I only pay attention to personal rejections with some kind of feedback or shortlist/close-but-no-cigar rejections, as they can actually help me crack a market on my next submission. But, here’s the general breakdown of all 705 rejections.
You’ll notice the math doesn’t quite add up here, and it looks like I have 727 rejections instead of 705. That’s because some of the form and personal rejections are also shortlist rejections. In truth, I think I might actually have more shortlist rejections than the 37 I have listed here, but there wasn’t an option to mark submissions as shortlisted Duotrope until fairly recently. If I had to guess, I’d say that maybe a third or a bit more of the form rejections are higher-tier form rejections, but, again, it doesn’t really matter that much.
So, what has 700+ rejections taught me over the past decade and change? Quite a lot, actually, and I think there are two primary lessons every writer should take away from rejection. Here they are.
One, rejections are inevitable. No matter how good you are, not matter how perfect a match your story seems to be for a particular market, you WILL get rejected, and the more you submit, the more rejections you’ll receive. You have to accept the reality of rejections in the same way you accept the reality of bad weather. It’s gonna happen and there’s not much you can do about it. But, like any force of nature, rejections aren’t personal (though they might feel like they are), and though it’s okay to get upset when you receive a tough rejection, the more you get, the less you feel them.
Two, even good stories get rejected. If you take anything away from the mess of stats I posted, it should be that. Out of 100-plus stories I’ve sold, a good ninety percent of them were rejected at least once, and most were rejected quite a bit more. In fact, I’ve done the math, and every story I’ve sold receives four rejections on average before an acceptance. It’s even worse when you look at short stories (as opposed to flash fiction) where I average almost EIGHT rejections per acceptance. In other words, don’t get discouraged by one rejection, or hell, fifteen. An acceptance happens when you put the right story in front of the right editor at the right time. Miss any one of those, and no matter how good the story is, it’s gonna get rejected. Keep. Trying.
As for what’s next, well, I’ve renewed my focus on submitting short stories this year and set some lofty goals for myself. First, I’m aiming to write one new story per week. Then, I want to send 150 submissions, and receive twenty-four acceptances, twelve of them with pro markets. So far, I’m on track, and I’m already racking up the rejections. If things progress like they have been, you should see an 800-rejections post around this time next year.
Happy writing. 🙂
Posted on March 3, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
February has come and gone, and it was a pretty solid month for submissions. I’m still on pace to hit all my goals for the year, from the number of submissions sent to the number of new stories written. Let’s dive in and take a closer look at the numbers.
I sent eleven submissions last month, four fewer than I sent in January. Strangely, this had little to do with not having enough stories to send, and much more to do with there not being enough open markets to send them to. I’m only submitting stories to markets that pay at least semi-pro rates, and I’m prioritizing those that pay a pro rate. What that means, especially when you have 20 pending submissions, is that you can quickly run out of desirable markets. This is particularly true with horror, where there are just fewer markets in general. So, toward the end of the month, I found myself with a handful of new stories and nowhere to send them. Thankfully, a bunch of markets opened up on March 1st, and I sent a flurry of submissions right away.
Sadly, no acceptances in February either, though I did receive another further consideration letter from a pro market, which brings my total to three. All of those held submissions are getting pretty long in the tooth, and I expect a decision this month on at least two of them.
My goal of writing one new story per week is still on track, and in February I completed five new stories, three shorts and two flashes. That gives me nine for the year, five of which are out on submissions, and I actually sold one in January. Not too bad.
Eight rejections in February.
A lot more rejections in February than January (all of the form variety), which is a trend I expect to continue. I’m sending out A LOT of submissions, and sim-subbing wherever I can. In addition, I’m submitting primarily to pro markets and tougher semi-pro zines. All this means the rejections are gonna start piling up, and I don’t think I’ll struggle to hit my goal of 100 no’s by the end of the year.
If you’ve been following my progress this year, then you know I have a new and fun way to track my writing goals. The bingo card below breaks up my primary goals into 25 bite-size mini goals, and this month I get to mark the first one complete.

Now, technically, I hit the 30 subs on March 1st, but I’m gonna go ahead an mark it complete here because, well, it feels good, damn it. Hopefully, when I update you on my March progress, I’ll have filled in a couple more squares.
And that was February. My goals for March are pretty much the same as last month: write one new story per week, send roughly 15 submissions, and, hopefully, net a couple of acceptances in the process.
That was my month. How was yours?
Posted on February 3, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
The first month of 2025 is in the books, and here’s my first submission statement for the new year. These updates will be a little different this year because my goals for 2025 are fairly ambitious. I’m also tracking them in a fun new way (more on that at the end of the post). For this first post, let me go ahead and quickly list my goals for 2025.
With the goals out of the way, here’s my monthly report card.
January was a very good month, and I’m on pace for all my yearly goals, except maybe rejections, but that’s more of a booby prize than an actual goal, so I can live with it. I need to average about 14 to 15 submissions every month to hit that goal of 150. If I keep writing new stories, that shouldn’t be too difficult, though. I wrote six new pieces last month, three short stories and three flash fiction stories, and those accounted for the bulk of my January submissions. I’m sim-subbing more this year, too, which should also help me hit my submission goals. The two acceptances were good ones, and one of them is up there with the biggest sales of my short story career. More on those when I sign the contracts.
Three rejections in January.
Not much to talk about here. The three rejections I received were all boilerplate form rejections. Two of them might have been higher-tier rejections, but I’ve honestly stopped keeping track of those, so I’m just gonna call the form rejections and move on.
This is the new way I’m going to be tracking my writing goals for the year. Check it out. 🙂
Yep, writing goals bingo. I don’t get to mark any of the boxes as complete for January, but I really didn’t expect to. I think I’ve got a pretty good shot at checking off a couple boxes in February, but we’ll see. If you’d like more info on writer goals bingo and how I made my bingo card, check out this post.
And that was January. My goals for the coming month are pretty straightforward. I want to write 4 new stories, send 15 submissions, and get 2 acceptances (1 pro sale). I won’t set a goal for rejections, but I’d need like a dozen to be on pace for a hundred for the year. lol
That was my month. How was yours?
Posted on January 30, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
Recently, I outlined my writing goals for 2025, which you can see here. One of those goals is to make at least 12 pro sales, but that leads me to the following question. What exactly IS a pro sale? It’s not as cut and dry as you might think, so, in this post, I’m going to go over some of the ways folks determine if a sale is pro or not. I’m also going to cover some of the gray areas, and then give you my thoughts on how I’m personally going to determine pro or not pro for my own story sales.
First, a few caveats. I’m a genre writer who writes primarily sci-fi, fantasy, horror, and crime, so the definitions of professional payment I’ll be using pertain only to works sold to markets that publish those genres. I have neither the knowledge nor experience necessary to make that determination for lit-fic. Also, I write short fiction and flash fiction, so I won’t be covering pro sales for poetry or drabbles because, again, it’s just not what I do.
To kick things off, let’s cover what I consider no-brainers when it comes to determining a professional sale.
Now, let’s get into the less obvious stuff, the gray areas that some folks might consider a pro sale and some might not. Below, I’ll briefly describe a situation where pro or not pro is not entirety clear and then tell you how I’m going to treat each one.
Okay, so there you have it, most of the ways you might judge a story as pro or not. There are some scenarios and corner cases I likely haven’t considered, but what I’ve got here should cover a good 95% of the scenarios a writer might find themselves in. To recap, for my own personal goals, here’s how I’m going to determine pro sales. A sale is pro if . . .
Please remember that all of my opinions above are simply how I’m going to determine pro sales for MY work. This is not a guide for how you should determine pro sales for YOUR work. I like to define and codify things, and this is just an attempt to do that so I can feel good about a silly little goal I’ve set for myself. 🙂
Thoughts on what makes a sale pro or not pro? Any scenarios I missed you’d like to talk about? I’d love to here from you in the comments.
Posted on January 24, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
This post is a little late in the month, but I thought I’d share my writing goals for the coming year, which are admittedly ambitious, and then show you a fun way to track writing goals in general. The main thrust of those goals is putting a greater emphasis on both writing and submitting short stories. This doesn’t mean I’ll stop working on or querying long-form fiction, but in the last couple of years, that’s been almost my entire focus (along with a lot of freelance work), and I want to get back to what is, honestly, my first literary love. So what does a greater emphasis on short stories look like? Let me show you!
As I said, my goals are ambitious, so let me outline them here along with a brief explanation for each.
Okay, so there are my goals, and where and why I’ve set them, but how am I gonna track them? That’s the fun part. I’m gonna play Writing Goal Bingo! Check it out.

Yep, there are all my goals broken down into 25 incremental steps, then mixed up so I can play a silly game with my ambitions. What I plan to do is update you every month on my progress and hopefully start filling in squares on the bingo card. Again, I know these goals are VERY ambitious, but I figure even if I only get halfway there, it’s still a pretty good year.
A quick shout out to Lex Chamberlin, one of my fellow Radon Journal authors, who came up with the writing goals bingo card in the first place and shared it with all of us on the Radon Discord server. I have yoinked it for my own uses with their permission. 🙂
So there you have it; my writing goals for 2025. What are your writing goals for the year? Tell me about in the comments, and if you want to play along, go ahead create your own writing goal bingo card. If you don’t have any graphic design skillz, don’t worry. I used an easy-peasy free bingo card generator you can find right here.
Posted on December 2, 2024 by Aeryn Rudel
Posted on November 27, 2024 by Aeryn Rudel
I’ve been writing microfiction almost daily for the past five years under the prompted #vss365 hashtag on all the social media sites I currently inhabit, and I’ve blogged about the benefits of tiny tales before, but it’s been a while, and, well, the social media landscape and some of my thoughts on the subject have changed (drastically in some cases). Anyway, I’ve gathered up these old ideas, updated them a tad, and stuck them in a new blog post. So, here are seven reasons I think writers should try their hand at microfiction.
So, there you go; seven solid reasons to write tiny. I can honestly say that microfiction has been a fantastic addition to my writing repertoire and has helped me overcome writer’s block, meet an awesome community of fellow writers, and provided me with some excellent story ideas. Well worth the ten minutes (or half an hour in some cases) it takes me to bang out another fifty-word epic about vampires or demons or hitmen or whatever. 🙂
Thoughts on microfiction? Let’s discuss in the comments.
