These posts used to be called Rejection Roundup, but seeing that it’s a new year, and, shockingly, I occasionally receive something other than a rejection from publishers, I think a name change is in order. So, let’s try “Submission Statement” (damn, I love me some alliteration).
January Report Card
Yep, let’s support the brand first and get to those tasty, tasty rejections. I mean, I didn’t call the blog Rejectomancy for nothing, right?
Rejection 1: 1/17/16
I had a chance to read the story. The conceit is interesting, however it’s not really suited for [XXX]. Thank you for the submission and best of luck in future writing.
This was the first rejection of 2016, and I covered it in detail in this post.
Rejection 2: 1/24/16
Thank you for letting [XXX] consider your story. Unfortunately it didn’t quite grab us. We wish you the best in finding its home.
This was yet another (form) rejection for one of my most beleaguered stories. It’s amassed thirteen rejections and counting and may soon become my most rejected tale. The thing is I really, really like it, and I think I just need to get it in front of the right editor. I’ve sold one story after thirteen rejections, so I’m sticking to my guns here. I’ve already sent the story out again. Check with me after twenty rejections, and we’ll see if my faith in the story still holds.
Rejection 3: 1/25/16
We have read your submission and will have to pass, as it unfortunately does not meet our needs at this time.
This is the first rejection for an old story I recently revised quite significantly. It’s the standard form rejection from a pro-paying market that turns and burns stories within a single day, though I’ve heard tales about rejections measured in hours from this publication. Anyway, I love the fact they’re so quick. It lets me get that story out to another publisher pronto.
Rejection 4: 1/30/16
Thank you for your submission. We have reviewed your story, and, regretfully, we have decided against using it. Unfortunately, we receive too many submissions to publish them all. We appreciate your interest in our podcast.
This form rejection is for the same story turned down in Rejection #3, but it was to an audio market. I’m seeing more and more of those, and I really like them because they’re usually not picky about reprints. I’ve submitted to this market a few times, but I’ve yet to crack them.
Rejection 5: 1/31/16
Thanks for letting us see “Story X.” I regret to say that it’s just not right for [XXX]. It’s a solid piece, with some good characters and good tension. Unfortunately, by the end, I’m afraid it just didn’t “grab” me the way it might have. I’ve been sitting here thinking why not, and it occurs to me that I never really connected with [the protagonist]. Maybe if it had been first-person instead of third-person. That’s not a request for a rewrite (I don’t make too many of those). It’s just a thought. In any event, I’m sorry. Best of luck with this one in other markets.
This is a nice informative personal rejection for “Story X.” I cover the letter in more detail in this post.
Rejection 6 & 7: 1/31/16
Thanks for participating in our Flash Phenom contest. The stories this time around were tremendous and made for some stiff competition. Unfortunately, [your stories] did not finish in our Top 10 finalists.
We always encourage folks to try submitting their entries for consideration in a regular issue of The Molotov Cocktail (free to submit), especially if you were a close-but-no-cigar in the contest. Thanks again for your participation.
We literally couldn’t do these contests without you.
So, I’ve broken my rules here and named the magazine to which these rejections belong. I don’t plant to make a habit of this, but one of my stories placed in the contest, and I want to talk about and link to it in this post. Also, the folks at The Molotov Cocktail are super rad, and they gave me the go-ahead. Anyway, I submitted three stories to the Flash Phenom contest, and two of them didn’t make the cut. The rejections letters were identical, save for the name of the story.
By the way, you should check out my Ranks of the Rejected interview with Josh Goller, the editor over at The Molotov Cocktail. It’s a good one, with tons of useful info for aspiring writers.
I caught just a whiff of the sweet, sweet smell of acceptance in January, and it was with one of my favorite publications to boot.
Acceptance 1: 1/31/16
Thanks for participating in our Flash Phenom contest. The stories this time around were tremendous and made for some stiff competition. We’re happy to report that your entry, “A Man of Many Hats,” has been selected as an Honorable Mention. Congratulations!
We will be publishing “A Man of Many Hats” in our upcoming Flash Phenom mega-issue, and it will be included in our Prize Winners Anthology print issue, due out in the fall.
Thanks again for your participation. We literally couldn’t do these contests without you.
Again, I broke my rules here, but this is the same publisher, The Molotov Cocktail, as the final two rejections. You can check out my honorable mention story, “A Man of Many Hats,” on their site by following the link. You should also check out the Flash Phenom mega-issue, which features the very worthy winners and all the honorable mentions.
Anyway, nice to get an acceptance to close out the month.
I rarely get letters outside of rejections or the occasional acceptance, but this month I did, and what I got was pretty encouraging.
Further Consideration/Shortlist Letter 1: 1/22/16
Just a quick update to let you know that your story has made it to the final round of reviews for publication in [XXX] magazine and anthology series. We expect to have our final choices turned in 30 days from now and will let everyone know if their stories have been accepted or not.
Thanks for your patience!
Fairly stoked about this letter. This is a pro-paying market I’d very much like to crack. It’s certainly encouraging that my story has made it to the final round of reviews. Hopefully, that’ll mean an acceptance and a publication, but it’s a tough ol’ market out there, so I won’t get my hopes up too high.
Well, that was my January. How was yours?
When I finish the first draft of a story or novel, I let it sit for a few days, then I go back through it like a literary hit man, ruthlessly pounding my delete key like the trigger on a suppressed .45. Notice I didn’t use a sniping metaphor. Nope, I need to get up-close-and-personal with the draft; I need to see the terror in that adverb’s eyes before I send it to the great delete bin in the sky. I have a short hit list of targets that crop up in all my drafts, so I thought I’d share some of them with you.
Keep one thing in mind, this is how I proof my drafts, and the things I adjust or remove and the reasons I do it is not one-size-fits-all. There’s a lot of debate on things like the use of adverbs and dialog tags (two targets on my hit list), and the way I use them or don’t use them is an attempt to achieve a style and voice I prefer. You may be going for something different, and that’s okay too.
Today, let’s talk about the first two things on my list: unnecessary adverbs and overused/repeated words.
1) Unnecessary Adverbs. Remember when I said there was some debate on a few of the things on my list? Well, this is one of them. Some folks like adverbs and others think you should expunge them from your manuscript. As a fan of writers like Stephen King and Elmore Leonard, I lean toward the latter, and I try to nuke as many adverbs from my manuscript as possible. That said, I’m not going to get into all the whys and wherefores of adverb editing—there are articles aplenty on the interwebs if you’re looking for that discussion. Instead, I want to focus on the almost-always useless adverbs that tend to pop up in my manuscripts. These adverbs are: absolutely, actually, certainly, definitely, particularly, simply, and suddenly. In most cases, I find these words add nothing to the sentence and just sit there, bloating my manuscript like literary lard. Here’s are three examples from my own work:
I’ve highlighted the offending adverb in the three examples. In all cases, I don’t think they add anything to either sentence nor do the sentences lose anything when the adverbs are removed.
Now, if you go and read anything I’ve published, you’ll find some of these adverbs, especially in my older works. Despite my checklist, I still miss things, and sometimes my editors have a different opinion on the use of adverbs, and, hell, I do like the occasional adverb (as you can see in example two). The goal here is to strive for my version of perfection with the understanding I’ll never attain it.
2) Overused/Repeated Words. This one falls squarely in the writer’s personal foibles category. We all have favorite descriptive words, and if you’re like me, you tend to use the fuck out of those words because they’re the first goddamn thing that pops into your brain. Case in point, whenever I have to describe something that is big, like, really big, I need to use the word massive (see example two in the unnecessary adverbs). It’s a fine word and all, but when you use it fourteen times in a 4,000-word short story, it becomes a little noticeable. It’s so bad that one of the first things I do when I finish a draft is run a “massive” search, then delete or change ninety-five percent of the ones I find. I think it’s a good idea for writers to identify their pet words and keep a list of them. I have a short and growing list I search for when I’m proofing.
What are some of the targets on your own proofing hit list? Tell me about it in the comments.
And we’re off! The first rejection of 2016 has come in, setting, I think, the proper tone for the coming Rejectomancy year. Here it is.
Hi Aeryn,
I had a chance to read the story. The conceit is interesting, however it’s not really suited for XXX. Thank you for the submission and best of luck in future writing
What we have here is a short and sweet personal rejection. This is a new market, and this was the first submission I’ve sent them. I thought my story was in the ballpark for the type of fiction they’re publishing—gritty, pulpy adventure stories—but it looks I was not as close as I thought. That’s the tough thing about new markets, if you’re submitting for their first issue, as I was here, there are no published stories to compare for subject matter, theme, etc. I’ll definitely submit here again, but I’ll likely wait until they put out that first issue so I can get a better handle on the types of stories they want.
How is your writing new year going? Rejections? Acceptances? Tell me about it in the comments.
If you write, then you research. You just can’t do one without the other. You simply can’t know all the little details that add that touch of realism and verisimilitude to your fiction. But there are some aspects of the real world that often get stretched or outright broken on a regular basis in popular fiction. One of the big ones is weapons: guns, knives, swords, and so on. It’s pretty easy to understand why. Most writers (and most people) these days just don’t have much practical experience with weapons, and the majority of their exposure to them comes from movies and TV, which are almost always wrong.
So, what is a beleaguered writer to do when he or she needs to arm her protagonist and make it sound halfway believable the character (and the writer) knows which part of the gun is the dangerous end? Well, you could spend hours on Google, looking through the hundreds and thousands of websites on the subject, never certain you’re getting correct information, or you could buy this book: The Writer’s Guide to Weapons.
I stumbled upon this little gem at Barnes & Noble a few days ago, and it was an instant purchases. Now, I know a fair amount about historical weapons, primarily knives, swords, and other melee-type implements from years of writing fantasy fiction (and the research that goes with it), plus two decades of SCA and other full-contact medieval recreation sports, but there are still big gaps in my knowledge, especially when it comes to firearms. This book fills in some of those gaps nicely.
So, what’s in the book? Well, it’s broken up into three parts: firearms, knives, and general info and debunking myths about weapons. One of my favorite parts of the book is the fictionalized examples of right and wrong use for each weapon. It really helps to visualize how the weapon works. There’s also a very handy guide on matching the right weapon to your character based on information like the character’s physical attributes and role in the story. Admittedly, this book has a heavy focus on firearms, though it does include some good info on modern knives. It does not cover swords, axes, maces, and other medieval weapons, so it might be of limited use to the fantasy author, but for the horror, thriller, and mystery writer, it’s definitely worth a look.
Here are some examples of questions–which invariably pop up when writing about weapons–the book handily answers.
This book is not a comprehensive encyclopedia of firearms and knives, and if you’re writing the kind of book that details each and every weapon in exhaustive detail, this likely isn’t the book for you. But if you’re a writer who has only a vague grasp of pistol, rifles, and other things that go boom, The Writer’s Guide to Weapons is a fantastic reference that can help you add just enough detail to make your gunslingers, knife-wielding thugs, and mafia hit men a little more believable.
Do you know of another good resource on this subject? If so, please share it in the comments.
Well, it’s a new year, a blank slate of dreams and possibilities, so instead of focusing on the future and what it might bring, let’s wallow in the past. Yep, it’s one of those year-end review/summary type things we bloggers just love to do. So here’s a look back at my writing in the year of our lord 2015.
This post with be filled with stats because they are super-duper exciting.
Total Submissions Sent: 46*
Honestly, this is fewer than I’d hoped, and a lot of this has to do with my position at Privateer Press, which I left in June. It kept me pretty busy, and I had a grand total of five (5) submissions from January to June. Things picked up a lot when I abandoned a good, steady-paying job with benefits to hang my hopes and dreams on the sure-fire, cannot-possibly-miss, super-good-decision of becoming a fulltime freelance writer. Anyway, I sent another 41 submissions from June to December, averaging almost seven (7) a month.
Acceptances: 5
Not too shabby since it’s really just the second half of the year we’re talking about. This is good for a 13% acceptance ratio, which is okay, but it could certainly improve. Some of the stuff I published this year is available to read online, right here:
Form Rejections: 23
Yeah, bunch of these things. Form rejections made up 56% of my total responses from publishers. Seems about right to me, but I’m sure there are writers who have gotten more than I have or a hell of a lot less.
Personal Rejections: 11
A fair number of these, and 27% of editors who didn’t actually publish my work had something (usually positive) to say about my writing. Personal rejections accounted for about 40% of my total rejections.
Never Responded/Withdrawn: 2
Just a couple of these, and one of them was my own damn fault. I sent a story to a publisher they’d already rejected like a giant fucking tool-bag. I fired off a very apologetic—i.e., I’m-a-dumbass—withdrawal letter soon after.
As some of you know, I write a fair amount of material for Privateer Press, and that stuff is not included in the stats above. So, what did I do for the fine folks at Privateer? Hey, look, more stats!
Novels: 1.5
Privateer has commissioned me to write a series of novels set in their Iron Kingdoms universe. I’ve finished one, and I’m working on the second. The first book is slated for publication in the third quarter of 2016.
Novellas: 1
I wrote a long novella or a short novel with former coworker and talented writer William Shick. It’s called Scars of Caen, and hey, look at that–a link to Amazon where you can check it out.
Short Stories: 6
A wrote a total of six short stories for Privateer Press, ranging in length from 1,500-word flash pieces to 10,000-word novelettes. You can check out some of these via Amazon right here. The others appeared in the magazine No Quarter or will do so in the near future.
Articles: 4
In addition to short stories, I penned a number of articles for the Iron Kingdoms universe and its two primary games WARMACHINE and HORDES. These also appeared in the Privateer Press magazine No Quarter.
And lastly but no leastly, we have this here blog. It’s been a lot of fun to do, and it’s provided me an outlet for my opinions and my personal writerly woes. The response to the blog and the nonsense I write on it has been really positive, and I’m thrilled so many folks find my blathering useful or entertaining. Anyway, continuing our theme of stats and more stats . . . here are some more stats.
Total Posts: 75
Total Visitors: 4,015
Total Likes: 514
Total Comments: 252
I’m pretty satisfied with those numbers for my first six months, and I think I’ve found a groove for how often I should post. Those 75 posts and other bits and bobs total about 75,000 words of material, which is a fair amount, I think, and I’ll likely exceed that handily in 2016.
Okay, broad view, and, yes, more stats. Here’s what my total output for 2015 looked like in hard numbers. I’m only counting stuff I wrote that was either published or is slated for publication. I certainly started a lot of projects last year that I hope to finish this year, but that’s too many disparate bits to pull together
Words Written: 290,000
Articles/Stories/Novels Published: 16
So, goals for next year. I’d like to double the number of horror/sci-fi submissions and shoot for an even 100. I’d like to increase my acceptance ration to 15%, which of course translates to 15 acceptances. One way I’d like to increase my submission rate is to complete at least one new story per month. I have ten or so in various states of completion, so this feels pretty reasonable.
I’m slated to write/finish three novels for Privateer Press in 2016, but if I can, I’d like to write a fourth novel for my agent to shop around. I’ve got some ideas for this book, but it’s another 90,000 words or so added to an already packed schedule. Might be tough, but it’s a goal worth shooting for.
As for the blog, I’d like to keep my pace of two to three substantive posts per week. That said, I have at least two novels coming out next year, so I’d like to use the blog to promote them. Don’t worry; I’m not going to turn the blog into a giant marketing platform, and the biggest change you’re likely to see is one additional post per week pimping out my latest book, story, or whatever. You can certainly ignore those posts, or, if you’re so inclined, click a link once in a while and behold the fruits of my labors.
Well, that’s my 2015 wrap-up post with too many numbers, self-aggrandizing drivel, and obvious excuses for failures and shortcomings.
How was your 2015? I’d love to hear about it in the comments.
Here’s a nifty little article I found on a blog called Writers Write that details the writing habits, and more specifically, the word count goals of 39 famous authors. The article is called The Daily Word Counts of 39 Famous Authors, and it features big names like Stephen King, Anne Rice, and Mark Twain. It’s an interesting read, and I’m always fascinated by the routines of well-known authors, since it can vary a whole lot.
Go read the article, and if you dig it, throw the author a like or a Facebook or Twitter share. In the meantime, here are some things I took away from it:
To put my own spin on it, my goal is a minimum of 2,000 words a day, same as one of my favorite writers, Stephen King. Since I started doing this full time in June, I’ve been pretty consistent, enough to finish one novel, a good portion of a second, and a bunch of short stories and articles.
Do you have a daily word count goal? If so, which writer’s routine from the article does yours most resemble?