The Complete Picture: Nine Years of Submissions
Anyone who has followed this blog for any length of time knows how much I love stats. From rejections numbers to acceptance percentages, I enjoy diving into the data to see how much I’ve progressed as a writer over the years. Now, normally, I pull these numbers from Duotrope by running Excel reports, doing a little math, and then pulling important data that I often share. Well, Duotrope has a new (I think?) feature that gives you all the basic submissions stats by year, and when I ran it, I realized some of my math has been a little off here and there. 🙂 Not by a lot, but by enough that I’d like to share my true yearly numbers in this post, so here they are.
| 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |
| Submissions | 6 | 16 | 38 | 46 | 53 | 74 | 120 | 76 | 87 |
| Acceptance Percentage | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.2% | 11.1% | 18.9% | 6.0% | 15.4% | 14.1% | 21.6% |
| Rejection Percentage | 66.7% | 85.7% | 81.6% | 84.4% | 79.2% | 89.6% | 81.3% | 83.3% | 77.3% |
| Non-Response Percentage | 33.3% | 14.3% | 5.3% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 4.5% | 3.3% | 2.6% | 1.1% |
| Accept-to-Reject Ratio | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.9% | 11.6% | 19.2% | 6.3% | 16.0% | 14.5% | 21.8% |
First, some definitions (as I understand them). Submissions is, obviously, the number of submissions I sent in each year. The acceptance percentage is derived from the total number of all submissions, same goes for rejection percentage. Non-response percentage is the number of subs that never responded or were withdrawn. Finally, acceptance-to-rejection ratio is the acceptance percentage with the non-responses removed. The last number is usually how I figure acceptance percentage, but some folks might prefer that number be derived from every submission, even ones that were withdrawn. The only number that is likely to be a bit off here is the number of submissions. That’s because I occasionally submit to markets that are not on Duotrope. Still that accounts for maybe three or four submissions total over the last nine years.
It was really interesting to go back and look at the last nine years of submissions to see how I’ve progressed. I didn’t get serious about submitting my work until 2014, and then things more or less improved each year (either I sent more subs or I got more accepted). Except for the blip in 2017–that was a really strange year–my acceptance percentage has been over ten percent, and in the last three years it’s been closer to fifteen percent. Though I fell short of my 100-submission goal in 2020, the acceptance percentage last year was the real achievement. Twenty-one percent is a great number, and I’d certainly like to repeat it in 2021.
Now lets look at my averages over the last nine years.
| 2012-2020 | 2014-2020 | |
| Submissions | 57 | 71 |
| Acceptance Percentage | 11.1% | 14.3% |
| Rejection Percentage | 81.0% | 82.4% |
| Non-Response Percentage | 7.9% | 3.3% |
| Accept-to-Reject Ratio | 11.5% | 14.8% |
The first set of averages is my true nine-year average. It’s certainly nothing to be ashamed of, and all the numbers are respectable enough. The second set, which I consider a truer picture of my submission efforts, starts in 2014 when I got more serious about my writing and my submissions. Those numbers, I believe, are more in line with the writer I am today, but I wanted to present both sets to give as transparent a picture as possible.
So there you have it, the most accurate picture I can paint of my submissions efforts in the last decade. Interesting stuff.
If you use Duotrope and have not discovered this feature yet, here’s how you find it. From the Duotrope home page, click Your Control Panel. About a third of the way down the page, you’ll see this link: See full report of my Submission Statistics. Click it and run reports to your heart’s content. I realize this may be old news to some folks, but I sure as hell missed it for quite some time. 😉
Anyway, if you’d like to share any of your numbers, I’d love to see them in the comments.
Weeks of Writing: 1/1/21 to 1/10/21
Here’s my writing report card for the first week and change of the new year. Let’s take a look.
Words to Write By
I really like this quote from novelist and playwright William Somerset Maugham,
“There are three rules for writing the novel. Unfortunately, no one knows what they are.”
― W. Somerset Maugham
I can go on Twitter right now and find a dozen different posts telling you dozen different ways to write a novel. Some of these posts will even be quite emphatic about how you must write said novel. I too am a lowly sinner, as I have given plenty of novel-writing advice on this blog. Ultimately, if you polled fifty different authors about their novels, you’d get fifty different formulas for writing those novels. That said, I will disagree with William Somerset Maugham on one small point. There is one rule to writing a novel that must be followed. It’s one of the few things every published author has in common. Ready for it? The only rule of novel writing is that you must finish the novel. Every book you’ve ever read required its author, at some point, to push away from their desk and say “done.” Sounds simple, but in my experience, the elusive state of finished holds back more authors than anything else. So, finish what you start. After that, make your own rules.
The Novel
I’ve got two novel in revision right now. Late Risers needs a little more work to be shoppable, and Hell to Play needs, uh, more. My goal for the first month of the year is the get Late Risers finished and ready to shop and Hell to Play through its second full revision. If I pull off just the former, I’ll be happy. Both novels are supernatural thrillers and need roughly the same kind of work, which mostly revolves around pacing. Late Risers needs some of the slow bits streamlined or removed altogether, and Hell to Play actually needs some slow bits added. The first novel drags a bit in the middle chapters, the second is a little too balls to the wall right now. It’s a strange balancing act of giving the reader a breather and boring them with too much standing around and talking. I’m pretty sure I know how to fix both problems, though.
Short Story Submissions
Here are the submission for the last ten days.
- Submissions Sent: 4
- Rejections: 3
- Acceptances: 0
- Publications: 1
- Shortlist: 0
- Pending: 6
Once again, my submission goal for the year is 100 submissions. If you break that down over a year, it comes out to about eight submissions per month (8.33 if you want to get technical). I’ve sent four in January so far, and I don’t think it’ll be too arduous to send four more. Then I just have to keep up that pace for the next eleven months. 🙂 The three rejections so far this month were all form rejections, so not much to discuss. I did have one publication with The Flame Tree Fiction newsletter, and when that’s available on their site, I’ll share it on the blog. No acceptances so far in 2021, and I’m not in a fantastic position at the moment to get one. My pending submissions aren’t likely to come through in January, and, well, I just need to send more of them. That’ll happen in the next few weeks, which will hopefully make February a good month.
Super Secret Project
Super secret project continues to develop, and I hope to make an announcement in the next couple of weeks. 🙂
Goals
I’d like to get a couple more submissions out this week, but that means I’ll need to revise and/or finish some short stories. I’d also like to make some heavy progress on the final revision of Late Risers.
And that was my week(s). How were yours?
2020 Writing Review Part 4: The Novels
I thought I was done with my writing review posts, but I spoke too soon. I, uh, remembered that the bulk of my writing time in 2020 had not been spent on short stories and their submissions, but on a pair of novels. So, you know, maybe I should talk about that. 🙂
Okay, here are the basic stats on the two novels I worked on last year.
- Late Risers is a supernatural thriller and clocks in it just over 100,000 words. It’s in final revision.
- Hell to Play is also a supernatural thriller (unrelated to Late Risers) and now sits at 91,000 words. It’s in its second full revision.
I wrote Late Risers in 2019, though I did a fair amount of work on it in 2020. I thought it might end up being a trunk novel. Then I let an insightful and trusted critique partner take a look at it, and I have reconsidered. The novel is maybe better than I’d thought. Work needs to be done, but I believe it’s sellable. I wrote Hell to Play in 2020, and the bulk of this post will focus on that novel.
Let’s talk about first drafts. Here’s how Hell to Play came together. WPWD means words per writing day.
- Date Began: 4/13/20
- Date Finished: 7/14/20
- Total Words: 89,188
- WPWD Goal: 2,000
- WPWD Average: 1,897
It took me roughly three months to write the first draft of Hell to Play, and I think that’s a pretty good pace for a novel. On the days I wrote, I averaged pretty close to my goal of 2,000 words. The first draft ended up right around 90,000 words, which, in my opinion, is a solid length for a supernatural thriller. It’ll likely grow a little in revision, but I wouldn’t expect it to eclipse 100,000 words. It was a lot of fun to write, and it’s based on my short story “Scare Tactics,” most recently appeared in Lost Souls an anthology published by Flame Tree Press.
Now let’s talk about revisions. I have undertaken two revisions on Hell to Play, and I’m currently on what I hope is my final revision of Late Risers. As a refresher, here are the steps I take when revising.
- Read and Revise. The first thing I do after I finish a first draft is let it sit a couple weeks. Then I come back to it, read it from start to finish, and fix obvious problems. I also clean up the prose, thought that’s not my primary goal.
- Critique Partners. After I finish my initial revision, I send the novel to my critique partners. I currently have three, and each one of them brings a different perspective and tends to focus on different areas of the novel. Their notes are invaluable in the next steps.
- Second Revision: Based on the notes from my critique partners, I revise the novel. This can be a lengthy task, and I’m currently working on this stage for Hell to Play.
- Polish Prose. After the second revision, I’ll give the draft a fairly thorough proofread and fix up the prose. Luckily, my critique partners are awesome about helping with prose too.
- Agent Review: Once the first draft is polished up, I send the novel to my agent. He invariably has additional feedback, which kicks off another revision.
- Final Revision: Based on my agent’s notes, I revise the novel again, and, well, hopefully that’s the end of it until the novel is sold. I haven’t gotten that far with either of these books, so this is where my list ends.
I believe Late Risers will be in shoppable shape by the end of this month, and Hell to Play should be ready for my agent to review around the same time. Hopefully, March and April will be interesting months. 😉
That’s the basics on my novel-writing in 2020. Not bad, though I’d hoped I would sell one of the novels last year. Obviously, no one in the world expected 2020 to be, well, 2020, so I’m thankful I was able to produce anything at all.
Did you work on a novel in 2020? I’d love to hear about it on the comments.
2020 Writing Review Part 3: Acceptances & Publications
Today we’re getting to the good stuff, and in the third and final part of my 2020 writing review, I’ll cover the acceptances and publications I received last year.
Let’s get to it with some basic numbers.
- Submissions: 87
- Rejection: 68*
- Acceptances: 19*
- Acceptance Percentage: 19.8%/20.9%
The 19 acceptances I received in 2020 ties my yearly best. The reason the rejection and acceptance numbers are starred is because some of them (two acceptances and four rejections) came from stories submitted in 2019, which can change certain numbers, depending on how you look at things. I’ve accounted for that in my overall acceptance percentages. The first number is derived only from submissions and acceptances sent and received in 2020. The second number is derived from acceptances received in 2020 and includes those derived from submissions in 2019. Either way you slice it, I’m pretty happy with this number. Twenty percent is by far the best acceptance percentage I’ve managed in a single year, so, yeah, good stuff.
Okay, now let’s look at the types of markets that were gracious enough to accept one of my stories.
- Pro: 9
- Semi-Pro: 1
- Token: 6
- Contest Wins/Cashes: 3
Although I broke out contest wins and cashes into separate categories, what I was paid for each one would qualify as pro payment. Anyway, the bottom line is that I was paid for 13 of my 19 acceptances, and 12 of those were at a pro rate (as defined by the SFWA and HWA). That’s by far my best year for short stories, and I made enough money that I actually have to claim it on my taxes. 😉
Now the length of stories I sold in 2020
- Flash Fiction: 14
- Short Stories: 3
- Microfiction: 2
No surprises here. I write more flash fiction than anything else, and that means I submit more flash fiction than anything else. My hit rate is also higher with flash, and though I do okay with short stories, flash has been my bread and butter acceptance-wise for more than a few years. So far I have a 100% acceptance rate for microfiction, but that’s based on a grand total of four submissions. 🙂
So those are the acceptance numbers, but what about publications? Well, I had twenty publications in 2020, most of which were for stories and articles I wrote last year. A few, of course, were for stories sold the year prior. I’ll list the 2020 publications that are free to read (or listen to) below.
Flash Fiction
“Second Bite” – MetaStellar – READ
“Fair Pay” – Flash Fiction Magazine – READ
“His Favorite Tune” – Flame Tree Fiction Newsletter – READ
“Childish Things” – The Arcanist – READ
“Stall Number Two” – Ellipsis Zine – READ
“Toward the Sun” – The Molotov Cocktail – READ
“Outdoor Space” – The Arcanist – READ
“Liquid Courage” – The Arcanist – READ
Short Stories
“Reading the Room” – The Overcast – LISTEN
Microfiction
“Dead Bugs” – 50-Word Stories – READ
“Futility Defined” – 50-Word Stories – READ
Articles
“The Quest for the Perfect Publisher” – Dark Matter Magazine – READ
“First Contact: Cover Letters” – Dark Matter Magazine – READ
“Who Are You: The Shot Author Bio” – Dark Matter Magazine – READ
“The Perfect Page: No Fret Formatting” – Dark Matter Magazine – READ
And that’s my acceptances and publications for 2020. That also brings my writing review for the past year to a close. I hope some of it was educational or at least entertaining. I’d love to hear about your writerly triumphs in the past year in the comments.
2020 Writing Review Part 2: Rejections
This is part two of my year-end writing review. You can find part one here. Today, I’m going to be looking at all the rejections I received last year and try to live up to the name of this blog. 🙂
Let’s get to it. Basic rejection numbers first.
- Total Rejections: 68*
- Form Rejections: 43
- Higher-Tier Rejections: 10
- Personal Rejections: 15
- Shortlists: 7
Some quick definitions. A form rejection is simply a boilerplate no without feedback or any of the signs of a higher-tier rejection. A higher-tier rejection, which some markets use and some don’t, is still a form letter but features language that lets you know your story was considered more seriously. I find the bigger markets are more likely to use higher-tier form rejections. Personal rejections are just that. The editor adds some personal note, generally encouraging feedback about the story. Shortlists are when the publisher notifies you that your story is being held for consideration or lets you know that it made it to the final round of consideration in the rejection. The shortlist rejection is tacked on to another type of rejection, usually a personal rejection but it can be a form letter too.
These numbers aren’t too surprising. I focused primarily on pro and semi-pro markets and, well, they generally send form letters. I did get some higher-tier and personal rejections from some of the big markets I submitted to, and that’s always encouraging.
Okay, we have the basic rejection numbers, now lets look at who was rejecting me.
- Unique Markets: 34
- Pro Markets: 20
- Semi-Pro Markets: 13
- Token Markets: 1
Nothing too surprising here. I’ve been focusing my submission efforts on pro markets and some of the bigger semi-pro. The numbers certainly bear that out. I did submit to more token markets in 2020, but they were one-offs, and I was fortunate enough to publish the stories I sent them. The most rejections I received from a single market was 7, and two other markets rejected me 6 times. The good news is each of those markets also accepted at least one piece.
Now that we’ve looked at who was rejecting me, let’s look at what they were rejecting.
- Unique Stories: 35
- Flash Fiction: 25
- Short Story: 10
- Rejected Stories Sold: 12
Again, pretty much what I expected. I write and submit flash fiction at about a three to one ration to short stories. I did manage to sell a dozen stories this year that also received at least one rejection, a good number
Finally, let’s look at my three most-rejected stories and see if that tells us anything.
- What Binds Us: 8
- Story X: 8
- The Past, History: 5
Of the three stories, I did manage to sell “The Past, History” this year and to a pro-paying market. I should also note it received three rejections last year for a total of eight before it sold. “What Binds Us” is the only flash story of the three, and it did get two shortlist rejections this year. That said, it’s pretty weird, and while I do think I’ll sell it eventually, it’ll likely take some time to find the right fit. “Story X,” on the other hand, is maybe the best piece of fiction I wrote last year (if I do say so myself), and it got close a couple of times with some very good markets. I’m confident it will find a home soon. Of course, it’s not actually titled “Story X,” but I need to keep the title secret for the moment.
And that was my year in rejections for 2020. It was fun to dive back in and read each no and not for us I received last year. I know that sounds depressing, but there was a lot of encouraging stuff in those rejections, stuff I can build on in the new year.
I’d love to hear about your rejections if you’d like to share in the comments.
2020 Writing Review Part 1: Submissions
This year, I’m going to break up my year-end review into three or four posts so I can do a deeper dive into the data. I’m starting off with the raw submission numbers, and I’ll cover rejections and acceptances in their own posts, as there are separate points I want to make about them that don’t fit into this broad overview. Okay, so how did I do submission-wise in 2020?
- Submissions: 87
- Acceptances: 19*
- Rejections: 68*
- Withdrawn: 1
- Pending: 5
My goal was 100 submissions, but I’m more than happy with 87. The number of acceptances I received in 2020 ties my yearly high, and I placed more stories with pro-paying markets than any other year. But let’s look a little deeper at the make-up of the submissions. First, how many distinct stories did I send and how many were written in 2020.
- Distinct Stories: 40
- New Stories: 20
I submitted 40 unique stories in 2020, and 20 of those were written this year. That’s about par for the course, honestly. Most of that has to do with how much flash fiction I write. I generally have a new and submittable flash piece every couple weeks. Now lets look at the length of stories I sent in 2020.
- Flash Fiction: 27
- Short Story: 10
- Microfiction: 2
- Novelette: 1
Well, none of this is surprising, save for the fact I actually submitted a novelette. The three to one ratio of flash to shorts is similar to previous years. Now let’s look at the genres of the stories I submitted.
- Crime: 2
- Fantasy: 9
- General: 2
- Horror: 18
- Sci-Fi: 9
I’d say the biggest change of 2020 came in the genres of stories I wrote and submitted. In years past, I wrote mostly horror, and I still produced a fair amount of it in 2020. I also experimented, with some success, with other genres, namely sci-fi and fantasy. To clarify, with a few exceptions, my fantasy is strictly of the urban variety, and some of it does feature horror elements. Same goes with sci-fi. Still, I’m glad I stretched my legs genre-wise in 2020, and I plan on continuing to do so in 2021. Now let’s look at the markets I sent my stories to.
- Distinct Markets: 45
- Pro: 26
- Semi-Pro: 15
- Token/Free: 4
I sent stories to 45 different markets in 2020. I counted markets that ran contests and have regular magazines submissions as one market. Same goes for markets that have a newsletter and anthologies and so on. As you can see, I focused primarily on pro-paying markets, though I did submit to a bunch of semi-pro markets too. I cut down on the number of token/free markets I sent to, choosing those with a broad reach and a large audience that will read my work (one of those netted me big spikes in blog traffic). This trend will definitely continue in 2021, and I’m hoping to crack some of the big pro markets in the new year.
That’s it for submissions. I’ll do a deep dive into rejections next and then acceptances. I’d love to hear about your submissions in 2020, so tell me all about it in the comments.
A Week of Writing: 12/14/20 to 12/20/20
One more week of writerly endeavors. Here’s how I did.
Words to Write By
Here’s a great quote from novelist Nora Roberts
“[As a writer] you have to have the three D’s: drive, discipline and desire. If you’re missing any one of those three, you can have all the talent in the world, but it’s going to be really hard to get anything done.”
― Nora Roberts
I believe talent is a necessary element in the makeup of a successful writer, but is it the most necessary? Some very successful authors like Nora Roberts and Stephen King seem to think not so much, or at least the level of talent doesn’t need to be off the charts for a writer to publish and make a living. I’ve seen successful authors along the entire spectrum of talent, from those whose prose just leaves me in open-mouthed awe and those whose prose is simply workmanlike (though they’re storytelling ability is often quite good). What I’ve found, though, regardless of the level of talent, is the authors who get published are the authors who finish things. And that, friends, is where I think Nora Roberts three Ds come in. To finish a novel, brave the feedback of your critique partners, revise the book within an inch of its life, and then submit yourself to the grueling process of querying and agent-finding and all that other stuff requires more than simple talent. It requires a whole bunch of drive, discipline, and desire.
The Novel
A little more progress on the novel, but it won’t be until the new year that I really get going again on the revision. Mostly what I’m doing now is finishing up some new material and working on my revision notes, clarifying things that need to be revised, and figuring our how I want to tackle them. My deadline for finishing the revision in January 25th, but I think I’ll likely knock it out in the first couple of weeks of the new year.
Short Story Submissions
Just one submission last week.
- Submissions Sent: 1
- Rejections: 1
- Acceptances: 0
- Publications: 0
- Shortlist: 0
- Pending: 7
Yeah, I only sent one submission last week, but there’s actually kind of a good reason for that. I was all set to fire off three stories and found there were no markets to send them to. When I went through my list of usual suspects, I found I’d already summitted the story and been rejected, the market had closed to submissions until the new year, or I had already had a story pending there. In other words, pickings are slims right now for markets accepting the genre and length of story I have to submit. Things will open up again in the new year, but I might just have to be content with 87 submissions and 18 acceptances for 2020.
The only submission activity of real note last week was the single rejection, but how that rejection happened is important. I had a story pending with a publisher with whom I’ve published before, and the story had been held for much longer than usual. Finally, feeling something was off, I sent a submission status query. Well, turns out, they’d rejected the story a couple of months ago but their system glitched and the rejection email never went out. I’m absolutely fine with this, because, you know, shit happens, but I bring it up because it’s a prime example of why you should send submission status queries when a story has been held longer than usual. Sometimes the editors are just running behind and sometimes an actual mistake has been made. You’ll never know unless you ask. So, ask. 🙂
Super Secret Project
Last week, I signed the contract for a project I am very excited about that must remain a secret for the moment. I hope to announce this project early in the new year and then bombard everyone with constant posts and updates about it. 🙂
Goals
No goals this week. I think I’m just gonna take it easy for the last week and change of 2020. Yeah, I might tinker with the book a little or send a submission or two, but if I don’t, I’m gonna cut myself some slack and just be okay with it.
And that was my week. How was yours?
Close Calls: The Shortlist Rejection
I’ve discussed the shortlist rejection a few times on the blog, but it’s worth revisiting, mostly because I’ve gotten a bunch this year. 🙂 First, a definition. A shortlist rejection is when the publisher sends you notification they’re holding your story for further consideration, then the story is ultimately rejected, usually with some feedback as to why and/or general encouragement to submit more work. For the purpose of this article, I’m using shortlist and further consideration as interchangeable terms (though, there can be slight differences).
In my opinion, the shortlist rejection is one of the toughest a writer is likely to encounter. You can’t help but get your hopes up, and the disappointment is a little more intense. But let’s dissect this further and talk about the significant aspects of the shortlist rejection, both those that should encourage you and some that might take the wind out of your sails (at least at first).
- Feedback. Most of the time, the editor will include some kind of feedback with a shortlist rejection. This will often be what ended up being the deciding factor for them not choosing to publish the story. This kind of feedback does two things. One, if you revise the elements that ultimately made the publisher reject the story, you might have a better chance of an acceptance on its next submission. Two, this kind of feedback often tells you a lot about what the publisher/editor wants (or doesn’t want) to see in a story, which is very useful for future submissions with that market.
- Ouch. For my money, the shortlist rejection stings more than any other. Knowing you got close and were ultimately rejected is a tougher pill to swallow than a filing away another faceless form letter. Additionally, the feedback you receive might highlight real issues with the story or your writing, and while that’s incredibly valuable in the long term, it can be a bit of a gut punch in the short term. Though I firmly believe the shortlist rejection is overall a good thing, they can cut a little deeper than other nos.
- Good story. If the story was held for further consideration or was shortlisted, that means it’s probably pretty decent, right? I think you can be confident you’ve written a piece that is likely sellable. For reference, my acceptance rate on stories that received shortlist rejections is right around sixty percent, as opposed to an overall acceptance rate of between fifteen to twenty percent (depending on the year).
- Good stories get rejected. Sometimes the shortlist rejection feedback will be all positive, and the reason for the rejection is something you simply couldn’t control. Maybe they just published a similar story or maybe it’s not a great fit for their upcoming issue or a dozen other perfectly valid reason. As I’ve said many times on this blog, good stories get rejected all the time, and that’s just a reality of publishing.
- On the radar. I’ve found that getting a shortlist rejection sometimes puts you on an editor’s radar in a good way. Often, my next submission to a market that’s sent me a shortlist rejection received a response quicker than usual and a few times it resulted in an acceptance.
- How close did I get? A shortlist or further consideration letter is often sent when your story is passed up to the editor by the slush readers. Sometimes, the story has to got through multiple editors after that before it’s actually accepted and published. Some markets have a transparent process, and will let you know exactly how far along your submission progressed before it was rejected. Some don’t, and you won’t know how close your story was to publication. This is not an indictment of how any publisher handles their submissions, mind you. There is always some level of uncertainty that goes with a rejection. The shortlist rejection, however, ups the ante and makes that ever-burning question what can I do better? burn a little brighter. This, too, is just another reality of writing, submitting, and all they comes with it.
Despite how disappointing they can be, the shortlist rejection is a net positive in my opinion, especially when they come from incredibly competitive pro markets. Your story made it through one or several rounds of cuts and was likely enjoyed by slush readers, editors, or both. That’s a good thing and more often than not, you’ll have an even better shot at publication with the rejected story and with the market that rejected you. When you get a shortlist rejection, it might smart a bit, but once the pain subsides, take heart in the fact that you and your writing are probably on the right track.
Thoughts on the shortlist rejection? Tell me about it in the comments.
A Week of Writing: 12/7/20 to 12/13/20
Another week down. Here’s how I did.
Words to Write By
Here’s a classic quote from William Faulkner.
“In writing, you must kill all your darlings.”
―
We’ve all heard this one before, and it’s been repeated by a lot of authors. What does it mean, though? Like all writing advice, its open to interpretation, and it likely means different things to different writers. For me, a darling is usually a humorous line of dialogue or a character thought I fall in love with that doesn’t really fit. For whatever reason, profanity is often involved. In other words, I’ll get a kick out of some crass line, even though it’s not really appropriate for the character or situation. For example, even the most foul-mouthed character will likely clean up their act a little at a job interview. Anyway, as I revise the novel, more of these darlings are jumping out at me, and, sadly, I’m murdering every potty-mouthed little angel I come across. A moment of motherfucking silence, if you please. 🙂
The Novel
I’m fighting the end-of-year doldrums but slowly working on the revision of Hell to Play. Last week I added 2,000 words to the book, material that served as a much-needed break in the action and fleshed out the protagonist’s back story a bit. I like how it turned out. As I mentioned in Word to Write By, I’ve also been pruning the existing text and working on the specific voices of the two primary characters. I think that’s been successful, and it’s helped differentiate their voices in dialogue, which was an issue in the first draft. Anyway, slowly but surely getting to a revised novel I can show my agent.
Short Story Submissions
Yeah, kind of dropped the ball on submissions.
- Submissions Sent: 0
- Rejections: 5
- Acceptances: 0
- Publications: 0
- Shortlist: 0
- Pending: 7
No submissions last week. I don’t even have a very good reason as to why other than those end-of-year doldrums I mentioned. I did get a boatload of rejections, though, and two of them were shortlist rejections from prominent pro markets. Both rejections came on the same day, by the way. Most of the time, rejections don’t bother me much, but these stung a bit. When you get a further consideration or shortlist notice, you can’t help but get your hopes up a little, so when that rejection comes, it’s harder to just shake it off. That said, getting shortlisted at these markets is a good thing, and I just need to keep writing and keep sending them my work.
Goals
The usual: keep going on the novel revision and try and get some more submissions out. It’d be nice to hit 90 subs by end of year, and I only need four more that.
And that was my week. How was yours?
A Week of Writing: 11/30/20 to 12/6/20
Here’s my past week of writerly endeavors. Normally, I’d try and play catch-up and cover multiple weeks since I haven’t posted one of these in a while, but the last month and change have been pretty hectic, so I’m just gonna start over. 🙂
Words to Write By
Here’s a quote from one of my faves, Elmore Leonard.
“If it sounds like writing, I rewrite it.”
—Elmore Leonard
This is one of Leonard’s famous (some might say infamous) Ten Rules for Good Writing, and as with any writing “rule” is more of a guideline to writing in a specific style than anything else. Since I also tend to write dialogue-heavy, description-light fiction, Mr. Leonard’s rules work for me. Now, this particular rule I apply mostly to dialogue. When people talk it needs to sound as natural as possible, and because my current WIP contains a TON of dialogue, I’m definitely trying to apply this rule wherever I can. How do you make dialogue sound natural? In my personal opinion, it’s half writing how people actually sound and half writing how readers expect people in a novel to sound. It’s a balancing act. Too far one way or the other and you end up with something that reads oddly or sounds broken or stilted. Of course, this is what works for me, and as usual, YMMV. 🙂
The Novel
After a couple of months away from Hell to Play, I’m back at work revising. Before I took my little hiatus, though, I wrote a detailed road map of what needed to be revised and how. I compiled this document from notes from my critique partners, had them look at it, and then made tweaks based on their feedback. I ended up with a document that is proving to be invaluable as I stare down 90,000 words of novel that need revisions and rewrites in a number of key areas. I’m not saying that task doesn’t still feel pretty daunting, but breaking it down into many separate tasks makes it easier to keep forward momentum and not get completely overwhelmed. Anyway, I’d like to be finished with this revision by the end of the month.
Short Story Submissions
A pretty good week for submissions
- Submissions Sent: 4
- Rejections: 0
- Acceptances: 0
- Publications: 1
- Shortlist: 1
- Pending: 14
Four submissions last week, which gives me a total of 86 for the year. Not too shabby. It’s unlikely I’m gonna send another 14 subs and hit my goal of 100, but that’s okay. My acceptance rate this year is the highest it’s ever been, and, even better, a good percentage of the acceptances were from pro-paying markets. I had one publication last week, which I’ll discuss below. The shortlist was with one of my favorite pro markets, and, honestly, completely unexpected. I sent them two stories, and the one they liked best was, uh, not the one I thought they would like best. In fact, I wasn’t going to send it in at all but went ahead and pulled the trigger at the last minute. It just goes to show you that you shouldn’t self-reject. Let the editors decide which story is the best fit for their publication.
Publications
One publication last week. My story “Second Bite” was published by MetaStellar. This is one of my favorite flash pieces, and it’s been shortlisted and ultimately rejected a few times. So it was very gratifying to get it published and at a pro rate to boot. You can read it by clicking the link below.
Goals
Full steam ahead on the revision of Hell to Play is the main goal. I’m doing pretty well with submissions, so I’d like to get at least two or three more out this week. Feels doable.
And that was my week. How was yours?
Effectively Wild – A Baseball Horror Story
Night Walk & Other Dark Paths
Acts of War: Flashpoint
Acts of War: Aftershock
Acts of War: Stormbreak
Aeryn Rudel's Rejectomancy 