I recently started querying literary agents for my novel SECOND DAWN, and I’m going to start posting about that experience. Now, for those of you who have followed my blog for a while, I should make it clear that unlike submitting short stories to lit magazines and anthologies, I am NOT an expert in this arena. So this post is less advice and more me recounting my experience (which may or may not be useful to you). In other words, don’t judge me too harshly if my experience differs from your own.
In this post, I want to talk about three things I think you should have ready to go before you start querying agents. The first two are absolutes, in my mind, but there’s some wiggle room on the third. Let’s dive in.
1) Finished manuscript. Finished. Complete. Ready to go. Don’t query agents unless you are ready to turn over a complete manuscript. Why? Well, here’s generally how the query process works. You send a query letter and a portion of the manuscript, anywhere from five pages to three whole chapters. If the agent likes what they see, they are going to ask you for MORE of the manuscript, maybe the whole thing. See the problem? Don’t put yourself in a situation where you have to tell an agent who likes your first three chapters that you don’t have a finished manuscript to send them.
Now, what does finished actually mean? Well, it doesn’t mean perfect. In my opinion, it means as close as you can get it to publishable, which is, honestly, not that close for most folks (me included). An agent is certainly going to ask for revisions based on their experience of what sells, and then the publisher is definitely going to ask for further revisions based on their needs and what they think will sell. Ultimately, it needs to be your best effort, but I’m not stressing about typos and dropped words and whatnot. Not that I’m not trying to fix those, just that I think an agent is less worried about that stuff than the story as a whole, my writing style, and whether both are a good fit.
2) Query letter. I’ve yet to see an agent that doesn’t want a query letter. The construction of the query letter is one of those things you’re gonna see a lot of differing advice on, and it seems to vary a little by genre. I’m on the second iteration of my query letter, and the one I’m going with now consists of the following: an introduction with the project details (genre, length, and comps), a short description of the book (this is not a synopsis, but it describes the plot, characters, and themes), and a bio with a little personal info and relevant publication credits. I feel more confident with this one than my first one, which may have been a little short on details. But, again, I’ve seen successful query letters that are similar to both my current one and the one I’ve abandoned.
3) Synopsis. Not every agent asks for a synopsis, but I’ve found more than half of the agents I researched (around 50 at this point) DO ask for one. Like the query letter, there are a lot of opinions on how to write a synopsis, but in general, most folks tend to agree on a few things. It should be in the 500- to 1000-word range (though I’ve seen some folks say as long as two pages) and summarize the whole story, from beginning to end. It’s not back cover text trying to hook a reader with mysterious details; it’s more like Cliffs notes. You want the agent to read about the big twist at the end and that surprise romantic relationship between two of your characters or whatever.
I’m not gonna lie; these are not easy to write, and I struggled with mine. I’m still not in love with it, but I think it works. Mine is a little over 500 words and fits on one page. I think the brevity helps rather than hinders me in this case, but check back in a month. My synopsis will probably have doubled in size. 🙂
You can start querying without a synopsis, as there are a fair amount of agents that don’t ask for one, but you might find yourself having to skip a potentially good agent because you don’t have all the necessary materials. By the time you get back to them, their submission window may have closed. So, yes, you can query without a synopsis, but you close off some of your options if you do.
Now this short list is only the things I think you absolutely need to start querying. It’s NOT the only things an agent might ask for. You might be asked for a one-paragraph pitch or more comps or a separate bio. I’ve even seen agents ask for fairly unique things like why you believe you’re the right person to tell the story. I’ll cover some of these other materials in later posts, as they come up in my own querying journey.
Thoughts on my must-haves? Tell me about it in the comments.
Time for another installment of Paths to Publication, wherein I recount a story’s arduous submission journey, complete with all the gory details and eventual publication triumph. This time, the story is “Hell to Pay – Installment Plans Available!”, which was recently published by Tales to Terrify.
First, let me tell you a little about the story. Years ago, I took a temp job as a collection agent. It was, hands down, the worst job I’ve ever had. I lasted two weeks before turning in my notice. The experience of that awful job has stuck with me, and a few years ago I started wondering what a job in actual hell might look like, and, well, here we are. The concept here is pretty simple. Certain folks consigned to the bad place are chosen for a special assignment, to work forever in an endless call center, collecting on those who have made Faustian deals. The story centers on one brave soul who attempts to subvert the system and offer debt relief to the damned. (I just realized that “Debt Relief for the Damned” might be a better title.)
Okay, now let’s look at the submission data for the story. Below is a table featuring the date, market tier, time on submission, and result for each submission of “Hell to Pay – Installment Plans Available!”
| Submission | Sub Tier | Date Sent | Days Out | Result |
| Pro | 3/19/2021 | 69 | Form Rejection | |
| Pro | 5/27/2021 | 4 | Form Rejection | |
| Pro | 5/31/2021 | 15 | Form Rejection | |
| Semi Pro | 6/15/2021 | 43 | Form Rejection | |
| Semi Pro | 6/21/2021 | 358 | Final Round Personal Rejection | |
| Pro | 9/1/2021 | 2 | Form Rejection | |
| Semi Pro | 1/23/2022 | 62 | Final Round Personal Rejection | |
| Semi Pro | 6/15/2022 | 65 | Short List Personal Rejection | |
| Pro | 8/19/2022 | 0 | Form Rejection | |
| Semi Pro | 8/27/2022 | 9 | Form Rejection | |
| Semi Pro | 9/17/2022 | 3 | Form Rejection | |
| Semi Pro | 9/23/2022 | 0 | Form Rejection | |
| Semi Pro | 9/26/2022 | 62 | Acceptance | |
| Semi Pro | 11/1/2022 | 27 | Withdrawn |
The submission journey for “Hell to Pay – Installment Plans Available!” was a long one, with a lot of ups and downs. I started by sending the story to pro markets that accept horror and, well, I got four form rejections in a row. Then I sent the story to a good semi-pro zine, and after waiting almost a year, got a close-but-no-cigar rejection. That one stung a bit. After that, I fired the story off to mostly semi-pro markets, landed more almost rejections, and then, finally, sold the story to Tales to Terrify in November of last year. The story was sim-subbed at the time, so the withdrawal is simply me informing the other publisher that the story had sold elsewhere.
This story, like a lot of my short fiction, racked up a fair number of close-but-no-cigar rejections. Those rejections are disappointing, but they do let you know that the story is very likely publishable, and that’s why I pushed on. Here’s one of those rejections.
Hello, Aeryn;
We thank you for very much for your submission. This piece did make it through to our final round of reviews, however, competition is especially tight for the larger word count spots. After the final review & rating by our full panel of six readers, it has been decided to pass on this story.
We wish you all the best in finding a suitable home for this piece, and look forward to reading further submissions from you in the future.
This is pretty typical of the close-but-no-cigar rejections I receive. Essentially, there’s no real issue with the story, there were just other stories they liked better. That’s how it goes with these rejections. Many times there’s little feedback, and what feedback there is often praises the story. You have to look at these rejections as a net positive, though. They are generally proof positive that the story is sellable, and only once have I failed to sell a story that received one of these. One thing you should always, always, always do is continue to submit to a market that comes this close to accepting you. Kind of a no-brainer, right? 🙂
So, what can we learn from the submission journey of “Hell to Pay – Installment Plans Available!” Well, it’s my usual advice. One, it’s all about timing and fit. Two, good stories get rejected, too. Three, keep going, keep submitting, especially if you’re getting those close-but-no-cigar rejections. It might take you thirteen submissions, but you’ll get there in the end.
If you’d like to listen to “Hell to Pay – Installment Plans Available!” out at Tales to Terrify, just click the image below.
Yesterday, I celebrated a significant short story milestone. I received my 100th acceptance since I started tracking them through Duotrope. To further celebrate this momentous occasion, I thought I might take a deep dive into the numbers on those one hundred acceptances and see what we can see. Let’s go!
I recorded my first acceptance on May 1st, 2014. Acceptance number one hundred was recorded yesterday, June 27th, 2023. So, a little over nine years to hit triple digits, but let’s take a look at the number of acceptances each year.
It took me a bit to get my first acceptance, though, to be fair, I only sent 22 total submission in 2012 and 2013. After that, I saw a pretty steady increase in both subs and acceptances until the anomalous year of 2017, where I sent the most subs I’d ever sent to that point but couldn’t BUY an acceptance. After that, it’s been double digit yeses every year, though I’m in danger of losing the streak in 2023 to a woeful lack of submissions. I’ve still got time, though. I can get seven acceptances in five months, right? Right?
I write and submit just about every length of story, but what length am I most likely to sell? Let’s take a look.
Well, it’s flash fiction by a mile. I’d say I write five flash pieces for every short story, and I generally find flash much, much easier to sell than longer works. I write a ton of microfiction through the #vss365 tag on Twitter, but I rarely submit it (though I’ve had good luck when I do). I have written exactly one novella, and sold it, so I’m batting .1000 right there. 😉
If you’ve been submitting sort stories for long, then you know there are essentially three levels or tiers of paying publishers. Pro publishers pay between 5 and 8 cents a word depending on genre, semi-pro publisher pay at least 1 cent per word, and token/for the love of it publishers pay less than 1 cent per word or pay nothing at all. So, what tiers do my acceptances fit into?
A fairly even distribution here, though the majority of token acceptances came before 2019. Now, I generally focus on pro and semi-pro. It should be said that five of 31 token submissions are paying contest wins that would be more than 8 cents per word, so you could look at this as 38 pro acceptances. I’m not, but you could. 🙂
My submissions have waned considerably this year as I turn my attention to other writing endeavors, i.e., novels. I still love writing short stories and flash fiction, but it might be time for a break. That doesn’t mean I’ll stop submitting, just that I might not submit as much. I have a feeling this is a temporary state of affairs, and I’ll get the short story submission bug in the near future. Until then, I’m gonna focus on agent queries, novel revisions, novel/novella writing, and a fair amount of freelance work. Don’t worry, though; I’ll be blogging about the trials and tribulations of all those things (especially the queries), so there’ll be plenty of rejectomancy in the future.
Hit any major acceptance milestones of your own? I’d love to hear about it in the comments.
For the last eight years, I’ve been regaling you (inflicting on you?) tales of rejection woe. Up until now, all of these rejection have had a single source–short story submissions to various genre and literary magazines and anthologies. Friends, that changes today. Not more than a few hours ago, I sent the first query to agents for my novel SECOND DAWN and opened up a whole new world of potential rejections. I’m using QueryTracker to find and record my queries, so I’ll have plenty of data to share with you. That is, of course, unless I manage to land an agent quickly (hah!). Anyway, I promise to share with you my arduous journey toward representation and hopefully publication, but for now, let me just give you the basics on WHAT I’m querying.
Back in 2017, I started a novel titled LATE RISERS that takes the vampire genre, flips it on its head, and then mashes it together with mystery/thriller. Many revisions later, it’s now called SECOND DAWN, and it’s ready to be judged by literary agents. Here are the basic stats.
So, that’s the basics, and as I send out queries, I expect the rejections to come rolling in, and I’ll share them with you (with certain details removed to protect the innocent). Hopefully, I’ll be sharing with you some more positive things, too, like partial and full manuscript requests and the like. I’m still going to keep sending short stories out, but I expect my submission rate there will slow (it already has) while I focus on this newer, bigger endeavor.
Anyway, wish me luck and stay tuned! 🙂
I recently had a story published with Radon Journal called “When Gods Walk”, and I thought it might be interesting to detail this story’s journey toward publication. It’s one of those pieces that’s been all over the place and, I think, it’s submission record illustrates the unpredictable nature of the publishing industry and one of the most important concepts for new authors to embrace: good stories get rejected, too.
Let’s start with the raw numbers. Below is a table featuring the date, market tier, time on submission, and result for each submission of “When Gods Walk.”
| Submission | Sub Date | Market Tier | Days Out | Result | |
| 1 | 2/19/2021 | Pro | 22 | Final-Round Personal Rejection | |
| 2 | 3/14/2021 | Pro | 18 | Form Rejection | |
| 3 | 4/1/2021 | Pro | 61 | Form Rejection | |
| 4 | 6/1/2021 | Pro | 4 | Personal Rejection | |
| 5 | 6/4/2021 | Pro | 3 | Form Rejection | |
| 6 | 6/12/2021 | Pro | 101 | Form Rejection | |
| 7 | 9/22/2021 | Semi-Pro | 101 | Withdrawal | |
| 8 | 1/1/2022 | Semi-Pro | 17 | Form Rejection | |
| 9 | 1/18/2022 | Semi-Pro | 43 | Form Rejection | |
| 10 | 3/4/2022 | Pro | 46 | Form Rejection | |
| 11 | 4/20/2022 | Semi-Pro | 4 | Form Rejection | |
| 12 | 5/17/2022 | Semi-Pro | 11 | Personal Rejection | |
| 13 | 1/17/2023 | Semi-Pro | 44 | Acceptance | |
The submission journey for “When Gods Walk” started out with a bang. That first rejection was from Flash Fiction Online, and though it didn’t make the final cut, getting that far gave me the confidence to keep sending the story out. I mean, every time that’s happened with FFO, I went on to sell the story elsewhere in short order. This time, well, that wasn’t the case.
Riding high on my almost from FFO, my next five submissions were all to pro markets. The personal rejection was another close-but-no-cigar, so that convinced me to keep submitting. Unfortunately, none of these submission panned out, and I sent the story to its first semi-pro market soon after . . . which folded after holding my submission for over three months. After that, I let the story sit for a while before sending it to two more semi-pro markets, where it was rejected, and then to another pro market where it was also rejected. I tried one more pro market roughly a year ago, got close, got rejected, and then took it as a sign that the story was probably not gonna sell.
Fast forward to eight months later when I was thinking about stories I could send to Radon Journal that might fit their dystopian/transhumanist/anarchist themes. I dug “When Gods Walk” out of the trunk, found that it’s subject matter might be a good fit, and fired it off. They liked it, and it was lucky number submission thirteen for the win!
So, what can we learn from the submission journey of “When Gods Walk”?
If you’d like to read “When Gods Walk” along with a whole bunch of other excellent stories and poems, check out Radon Journal #4, which is free to read online.
Recently, as I was looking at submissions at Duotrope, it struck me how some of my submission records for various markets paint an interesting picture of how submissions and publications tend to work. Primarily, these records show how important it is to match up the right story with the right editor/market. Not every story, no matter how good, is going to be a good fit for every publisher. I pulled my submission records for one of my favorite flash fiction markets, Factor Four Magazine, to illustrate this point. Below, you can see the 18 submissions I’ve sent to Factor Four, the outcome of each, and if the story was subsequently published elsewhere and with who.
Note, that Factor Four or any publisher is not wrong for rejecting a story, even one that sells elsewhere. That’s extremely common, even with stories rejected and bought by the biggest pro markets. As I said above, publishing a story is about finding the right market for it, and I think the submission record below is clear evidence of that.
| Pieces of Heaven | Factor Four Response | Published |
| Coffee Fiend | Factor Four | |
| Pieces of Heaven | ||
| Reporting for Duty | Flash Point SF | |
| When Gods Walk | Radon Journal | |
| Hail to the King | ||
| Mixed Signals | Flash Point SF | |
| What You Pay For | The Arcanist | |
| Fertilizer | Radon Journal | |
| Another Path | ||
| Big Changes | ||
| Time Waits for One Man | Factor Four | |
| Far Shores and Ancient Graves | NewMyths | |
| Burning Man | Havok | |
| The Inside People | The Molotov Cocktail | |
| Scar | Horror Tree | |
| What Kind of Hero | Ellipsis Zine | |
| Your Donation is Greatly Appreciated | ||
| When the Lights Go On | The Arcanist |
Okay, let’s dive into this and see if there’s anything we can learn. In my experience, one of the best ways to learn what kind of story a publisher likes is to, well, send them stories. Reading the magazine is definitely a good place to start, but after that, paying close attention to your rejections and acceptances can be absolute gold.
So, is there anything similar about the two stories and one close-but-no cigar rejection from Factor Four? There is. One, each of the stories deals with some aspect of Christian/biblical mythology: “Time Waits for One Man” is about well-known biblical figure, “What You Pay For” is about a Faustian deal (with a little Greek mythology thrown in), and “Coffee Fiend” is an urban fantasy piece about angels and demons. Two, each story has a fair amount of dialogue. Three, each is written with a sense of grim humor. And, four, each has kind of a twist ending. Now, it should be noted that writing a supernatural story with lots of dialogue, a little humor, a twist ending, and with Christian mythological themes is not a recipe for instant success with Factor Four. In fact, they rejected my story “Another Path”, which features all those elements. It is entirely possible that these elements are simply coincidental, and the editor just liked each story regardless of their similarities. Keep that in mind before you start writing that grimly hilarious, dialogue-laden story about Moses the vampire. 🙂
As for the stories that Factor Four rejected and were published elsewhere, there’s something to learn there as well. The biggest thing, again, is that a story that doesn’t fit for one market might be a great fit for another. Once more, for the folks in back, this is not about an editor being wrong when they reject a story. It’s about editorial taste and market fit. Interestingly, before The Arcanist sadly went on indefinite hiatus, they published a lot of my supernatural/humorous stories, so it’s not too surprising they picked up “What You Pay For.” The two stories accepted by Radon Journal are fairly bleak dystopian pieces that comment on religion and the value of human life. They’re similar in tone, and I felt like they might be a good fit based on Radon’s guidelines and want list (it’s nice to be right every now and then). The two stories I sold to Flash Point SF are both near future sci-fi pieces, and although somewhat bleak, they have what I’d call hopeful or even uplifting endings. The other sold stories here run the gamut of themes and genres, and I wouldn’t say they give me any strong indication of the publisher’s tastes. Those that haven’t sold yet, well, all but one have been retired after close to or more than double digit rejections.
To sum up, pay close attention to your submission track record with a publisher, even if you haven’t cracked them yet. If you’re getting close-but-no-cigar rejections or if you’re actually getting accepted with the same kinds of stories, you’ve likely hit on the market’s individual tastes, and that, my friend, is damn fine information to have.
Have you identified the specific tastes of any of your favorite markets? I’d love to hear about in the comments.
There are a lot of valid reasons to withdraw a submission, and I’ve covered most of them on this blog. Generally, a submission is withdrawn because the publisher fails to respond in a timely manner or at all or, more commonly, the submission is accepted elsewhere in the process of a sim-sub. You can have a look at my thoughts on those withdrawal situations like those here and here. But, is there ever a time an author might consider pulling a story after it’s been accepted? Unfortunately, there is. Let’s talk about that.
The Rights Reversion Clause
When a publisher accepts a story, they have you sign a contract, and, most of the time, they’ll give you a publication date for your work. That date might be tentative, but in my experience, most publishers get in the ballpark of when they say they’re going to publish. But what if that date comes and goes, and the story is not published? Well, then everything hinges on one important clause in the contract called a rights reversion clause or sometimes a drop dead date.
Here’s what that clause might look like (from the SFWA model contract)
If the Publisher fails to publish the Work by [the date by which first publication must be made], all rights granted hereunder shall immediately revert to the Author. In such event, the Author shall retain any payments made under this Agreement prior to such reversion.
The SFWA model contract suggests a maximum period of one year before rights revert to the author. So, if a publisher has this clause in their contract, and they fail to publish the story within the stated time, the rights immediately return to you, and you can start submitting the story elsewhere. But should you? Let me answer this by saying only once in all my publications has a publisher even gotten close to activating this clause. When they did, I reached out with a status query and got an immediate update and a new publication date. Since they’d already paid me, and they were prompt and professional with the reply, I was happy to wait. I’ve been a magazine editor, and I know shit happens. Stories can fall through the cracks, things get shuffled around, and you’re just trying to do your best to keep the trains running on time. So, if a publisher communicates with me openly and honestly, as the one above did, I’m not gonna pull the story. Your mileage may vary, but I’d give the editor a chance to respond, give me a new date, and proceed from there. If they don’t respond or keep stringing you along, well, then, it might be time to move on.
If you do decide to pull a story in this situation, I think you should do the professional thing and notify the publisher that the rights reversion clause has been activated and you’re moving on. How a publisher might respond to this is anyone’s guess, but, at this point, you’ve been patient, and it’s not fair for a publisher to lock up your story for a year or more without any kind of publication date in sight.
No Rights Reversion Clause
Let me start all this by saying that I am not an attorney, and what follows is simply my layman’s interpretations of publisher contract language based on personal experience. So, this is not legal advice or anything of the sort.
So, what happens if all the things mentioned above come to pass but the publisher does NOT have a rights reversion clause in their contract? Well, then things get more complicated. First, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to ask a publisher to amend a contract and add a rights reversion clause before you sign it. Some might do it, some might not, but at least you can then make the determination to sign the contract or not and avoid any issues with an accepted story languishing in publication limbo. But let’s say you signed a contract that doesn’t include a rights reversion clause and the months start to pass, no publication date is forthcoming, or the one you were originally given comes and goes without publication. What do you do then? As always, I believe communication is key. Send the publisher a status query asking for a new publication date. If you get one, then I’d say give the publisher a chance to make good. If you get crickets or a nebulous response, then you’re kind of in a tough spot.
As far as I understand it, without the rights reversion clause, there isn’t a simple way for you to pull your story if a publisher fails to publish it in a timely manner. The best you can do is contact the publisher and request that they let you out of the contract. That said and again, as I understand it, the publisher is under no obligation to release the story back to you. If you go ahead and publish it elsewhere anyway, you’re might be in breach of contract. Anyone with a background in contract law, please correct me in the comments if I’m off-base here.
Failure to Publish Best Practices
In short, this is a shitty situation no author wants to find themselves in. Luckily, out of some 700 submissions, I’ve only run into a situation like this once, so I don’t think it’s particularly common, especially with publishers who have a rights reversion clause in their contracts. The best thing you can do to avoid situations like the ones above is make sure you cover your bases with a rights reversion clause before you sign on the dotted line. Then, if you are forced to pull a story, you’re covered from a legal standpoint, which makes the whole shitty process a little less shitty. 🙂
Thoughts on rights reversion clauses and failure to launch? If you have any legal insight into this situation, I’d definitely love to hear about it in the comments.