Posted on September 24, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
There’s a phenomena in baseball and other professional sports where a player, usually a rookie, has a fantastic inaugural season, goes into the next season with massive expectations, and then, well, puts up mediocre numbers to huge surprise and disappointment. This is often called a sophomore slump, but I’ve always thought of it as the whiplash effect. It’s so hard to be at the top of your game on a consistent basis, largely because there’s a fair amount of luck involved in that kind of success, so regression is almost inevitable. When it happens, it can shake you up, make you doubt yourself, and wonder if your success was just a fluke. That’s what 2021 and year seven of necromancy was for me. Not a terrible year, but compared to the lofty heights of 2020, certainly a disappointment.
So, let’s have a look at Rejectomancy Year Seven.
Total stats for 2021.

I was definitely productive in 2021, and it was the third time in my career that I exceeded 100 submissions in a year. The other results, however, were not so great. I managed a fairly meager sub 10% acceptance rate, less than half what I achieved the year before. I did make a fair number of sales, and even a few pro sales, but I struggled to sell anything longer than flash, which I’ll detail a bit more below. I wouldn’t call 2021 a bad year, but it was certainly a disappointing year.
Here are all my acceptances for 2021.

I landed 12 total acceptances in 2021, and if you look, you’ll see a lot of my usual suspects. Three stories to The Arcanist, two to Flash Point SF, and a smattering to other markets I’d sold to before and continue to sell to today. The new kids on the block were Wyldblood and Shotgun Honey, and 2021 marked my first acceptances with these markets. So, not a bad a year in terms of sales, but it was a struggle year, and let me see if I can explain why.
Twelve sales out of 102 submissions isn’t awful, but I can definitely remember struggling in 2021. As I look back at my submission record, it’s easy to see why. A lot of close-but-no-cigar submissions, and often for the same story. For example, “The Downer”, which I eventually sold to On Spec, received 16 rejections before that sale, many of them in 2021. Another story, “When Gods Walk” racked up 13 rejections before I sold it to Radon Journal in 2023. It, too, received many of these rejections in 2021. The list goes on, and it seemed to be a year of getting close, but not close enough. Timing is a big deal in this business, and selling a story is all about right time, right publisher, right editor. I just couldn’t line all those tumblers up in 2021.
And that’s Rejectomancy Year Seven. Quite the let down from year six, but overall not a bad year, and a far cry from my worst. THAT year is looming on the horizon, and we’ll get to it soon. 🙂
If you’ve missed any of my Ten Years of Rejectomancy posts and want to catch up, here are the links to the others in the series.
Thoughts or opinions about Rejectomancy Year Seven? Tell me about it in the comments.
Posted on September 18, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
When I set out to write this series, I knew I’d be writing openly and honestly about the ups and downs of the publishing business as well as the grueling grind of submitting short stories. As such, I’ve detailed decent years, disappointing years, and, yeah, even a bona fide good years. Today, I get to write about something even better, a stellar year, my best submissions year ever in the decade and change I’ve been doing this.
So, let’s jump into Rejectomancy Year Six.
Total stats for 2020.

So, as you can see, 2020 was a all kinds of good. I sent a solid number of submissions, and I managed an acceptance percentage over 21%. That’s pretty hard to do, and I was and am damn proud of my hit rate in that year. I also made a decent amount of money on short story sales, and while it’s not the kind of cash that you can make a living on, it ain’t bad for publishing flash and shorts in the SFFH market. If I hadn’t already been an SFWA member, I would have qualified for a full membership off this year alone. So, you know, not too shabby.
And here are all my acceptances for 2020.

I scored 17 acceptances in 2020, one less than than the 18 I scored in 2018, which remains my personal record. That said, the quality of acceptances in 2020 was much better than 2018. Eleven of my seventeen acceptances were to pro-paying markets, and there’s a first place flash contest win in the mix as well that netted me 300 bucks. Not bad.
In addition to the acceptances, I got a lot of close-but-no-cigar rejections from pro markets. It was already a great year, but I can’t help but feel that I was a stone’s-throw away from something truly epic. This is not to say that I look back on 2020 with any kind of regret. If I could put this year on repeat from now until the end of my career, I would absolutely do it.
Again, you’ll notice that many of the markets I sold stories too just five years ago have closed, gone on indefinite hiatus, or, in the case of Dark Matter, stopped publishing a periodical to focus on books and anthologies. This is, unfortunately, just an indicator of how hard it is to publish and sustain a magazine or journal. Something that’s only gotten more difficult in the past few years.
And that’s Rejectomancy Year Six. We have climbed to the peak of my personal submissions mountain, and though I will have some decent years to come, I haven’t been able to quite reach the heights I attained in 2020. This year, for instance, has been okay, but we’re in no danger of using words like “best” or “greatest” or “stellar.” 🙂
If you’ve missed any of my Ten Years of Rejectomancy posts and want to catch up, here are the links to the others in the series.
Thoughts or opinions about Rejectomancy Year Six? Tell me about it in the comments.
Posted on September 10, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
I set a lot of personal submission records in 2018 (year four), and though year five wasn’t nearly as good, I maintained both a solid number of submissions and a respectable number of acceptances. In other words, I was consistent, and that’s not a bad way to be in the grueling and often cruel world of publishing. This is not to say there wasn’t some regression, but it’s the kind I can live with. Anyway, let’s take a look at Rejectomancy year five.
Total stats for 2019.

After the banner year of 2018, I was expecting more of the same in 2019. Unfortunately, it was not to be. This is not to say that 2019 was an awful year–far from it–but it was definitely a step back in terms of number of submissions and the number of pro sales. The number of submissions I made was solid, and I did manage an acceptance percentage of a tad over 14%, which is respectable. So, in all, a decent but not exemplarily year of submissions.
Let’s take a look at the acceptances for 2019 and see what they tell us.

I managed 13 acceptances in 2019, and while that’s not too bad, there’s only two pro sales in the bunch. The rest are semi-pro and even token/non-paying. Looking at my overall submissions for the year, the thing that jumps out at me is that, well, I was submitting a number of stories that I’ve since retired because they weren’t good enough. In addition, two of the acceptances, “The Back-Off” and “Paint-Eater” took me a LONG time to sell, despite them both being pretty good stories. Each racked up over 15 rejections. Of course, there are some bright spots here. I sold my first story to On Spec, which is a fantastic semi-pro Canadian market. I’d go on to sell them another of my hard-to-place stories a few years later.
You may notice once anomaly in my acceptance list, and that’s the sale to The Bronzeville Bee, a market that’s marked REMOVED and closed down shorty after I received an acceptance from them. I left it as an acceptance (because it was), though I maybe should change it to lost/returned now. I’d go on to sell that story for reals to MetaStellar, a much better market that actually still exists. 🙂
And that’s Rejectomancy Year Five. Not bad, but definitely a step back when compared to the prior year. I did write two novels in 2019, so I was pretty productive, and as it turned out, 2019 was simply the lull before the storm. The following year I would have my best submissions year EVER. Stay tuned for that. 🙂
Thoughts or opinions about Rejectomancy Year Five? Tell me about it in the comments.
Posted on September 5, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
Today on The Daily NO, we’re going to look at the first rejection I received for a story that would go on to collect a record-setting (for me) 25 rejections before I sold it. This is definitely a case of sticking with a story you believe in, even when the NOs start really piling up.
Okay, let’s take a look.
Rejection #7
Thank you for allowing us to read your story, When Stars Fall, submitted to the General Submission Window submission window on 8/10/2021.
Thank you for being patient while we held your story, but we did not choose it for the lineup. Any story in the hold pile was one that we would have been happy to publish, but we didn’t have the resources to publish all of the stories that we liked and we have to make some hard choices. We hope you find a publisher for it, and that you will submit again in the next submission window.
While we don’t always offer comments on stories, this time we did. The following comments are meant to be helpful; if you disagree with the comments, then you should feel free to disregard.
[Editor] said: I appreciated the clear character motivations and the dinosaur hunting action. Though I like epistolary formats I did wonder if that was the best choice here where the journal is presumably going to be destroyed very soon after. Readers generally liked the action and the ideas here.
Some readers had some plausibility questions about it. In the lack of survival gear, the oddity of having to continue hunting them with modern science it would probably be synthesized once found (though that could be handwaved away), and wondering how they prevent “butterfly effects” causing major changes to the future.
Readers said, in part:
* Whoa, this one was extremely good. I felt connected to the character and a little sadness at what his motivations were, but also loved the world building. The prose came alive to me and made me really absorbed in it. Excellent story.
As rejections go, they don’t get much better than this, and I would expect nothing less from a market as professional and well respected (deservedly so) as Diabolical Plots. The rejection starts out with the usual boilerplate business, informing me that though they liked the story, they’re not able to publish it. Then the editor goes on to talk about a few issues he and some of the readers had with the story, as well as imparting some of the things the readers liked about the piece. Everything is delivered in a constructive, helpful way, all with the preface of “if you don’t agree, please feel free to disregard.” I know that doesn’t seem like much, but I do appreciate it when editors couch their comments in the frame of opinion, even if that opinion is a very well informed one, as it absolutely is here. The last bit where the editor includes what is essentially just praise for the story is just a damn classy thing to do, and it both softened the blow of the rejection and sent me away feeling like I would eventually find this piece a home.
My grade for this rejection. Five stars. A+. No notes.
I did take some of the feedback here to heart and made revisions to the story. Specifically, I addressed the lack of survival gear, the potential butterfly effects of time travel, and how the journal would survive. These changes definitely improved the piece, and I think helped eventually sell it.
This rejection, with all its praise and constructive feedback, gave me the confidence to keep submitting the story. It continued to rack up personal rejections like this from pro markets, but that just further fueled my persistence. I sold it to Abyss & Apex Magazine last month, and though it took me almost four years to find this story a home, I’m glad I kept with it.
The lesson here is simple. If you believe in a story and it’s getting the kind of rejections you see above, stick with it, maybe a make a few revisions, and keep firing it out there. There’s a very good chance an acceptance is around the corner . . . or you know, a few corners. 😉
Thoughts on this rejection? Tell me about it in the comments.
Posted on September 4, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
Welp, another month has come and gone, and it’s time to tally up and see how I did submission-wise for August. Let’s take a look.
I sent 10 submissions in August, which is not bad, but it does put me behind my goal a bit. I’ve got 83 subs in total for the year, and if I want to hit my goal of 150, I’m gonna have to send at least 15 subs a month for the rest of the year. Doable, but I need to write more new material, which is something I’ve been struggling with of late.
It was a really slow month for rejections, which is, you know, fine by me. Of the four, two were form rejections, another was a nice second-round personal NO, and the last was a dreaded no-response rejections. I just hate those, but that’s, unfortunately, how some publishers operate.
I did manage to sell one story last month to a new-to-me semi-pro market. It was another vampire story, and I’m always thrilled whenever I can get yet another bloodsucker in print.
The bad news for August is that I only managed one new story, and I’ve really fallen off my initial one story per week goal. Now, I’m not too upset about that. I’ve still been more productive on the short story front this year than I have in a long time, and I will write more in 2025. I’ve got 22 new stories thus far, and if I can into the 30s, I’ll be very pleased.
Four rejections for August.
Nothing too exciting in my rejections for August. The form rejections were your typical boilerplate specials, and the personal rejection was also a close-but-no-cigar rejection, which I’ll share below.
Personal Rejection
Dear Aeryn,
We appreciate the opportunity to read “Love Is Like That Sometimes,” and thank you for submitting it to us. Unfortunately, we’ve not accepted this story for publication.
You made it to the second round of submissions, which is no small feat! We publish one story a month, and we receive hundreds of excellent submissions. As a result, we turn away many stories we enjoy and admire.
I really enjoyed the creeping sense of dread that works its way into your story— it kept me riveted all the way to the end. What a brilliant ending as well, I was so conflicted over my emotions for your main character; I went from sympathy to curiosity to wondering if she did the right thing by keeping her mother and Jasper “alive” in the states they were in. Grief can be a powerful and crazed thing, for sure. Very well done.
I wish you success in publishing your piece elsewhere and hope you’ll consider submitting more work to us in the future.
Best regards,
Fiction Editor, Orion’s Belt
How can you not love Orion’s Belt, huh? Yeah, they’re a tough market to crack because they only publish one story a month, but their personal rejections are so sincere and validating. There’s never any doubt in my mind when I get a NO from Orion that a) they actually read the story and b) they meant every word they said. Definitely some good folks running that outfit.
And, finally, here’s my 2025 Writing Goals Bingo card. Nothing has changed, though I’m at the threshold for a few more green stickers, which I hope to hit next month.

Like I said, no changes from the last update, but next month I will definitely fill in the 60 Rejections and 90 Subs spots, and I have a pretty good shot at filling in the 25 New Stories and the 10 Accept spots. Fingers crossed and all that.
And that’s it for August. My goals in September are more stories, more subs, and to finally make some headway on some larger projects I’ve been putting off.
I’ve told you all about my August. Tell me about yours.
Posted on September 1, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
After what seemed an unmitigated submission disaster in 2017, I really turned a corner in 2018 and had one of my best years to date. In fact, 2018 was so good, I’ve yet to equal it in either number of submissions or number of acceptances. That’s quite a rebound, and 2018 gave me a lot of confidence to up my game in terms of where I was sending my work in years to come. Anyway, let’s dive into Rejectomancy year four and see what we can see.
Total stats for 2018.

When 2018 started, I thought it was gonna be just like 2017, maybe worse, but then the acceptances started trickling in starting in February and then hit a fever pitch that summer, where I netted eight total yeses in June, July, and August. The fall and winter were almost as good, and I closed out the year with a shipping 18 acceptances. Which is still my current record. I also set a record for total number of submissions, and 120 remains far and away my best effort to date. My acceptance percentage is the only part of 2018 that wasn’t record-setting (that would come in 2020), but hey, 15.4% is still pretty damn good.
Let’s look at the acceptances for 2018, and see if we can figure out why it was such an improvement over 2017.

So the story of my success here should be fairly obvious. Find a market that likes your work and keep sending them stories. I have multiple acceptances from The Arcanist, The Molotov Cocktail, and Ellipsis Zine. I went on to publish double digit stories with those first two, and a good half a dozen with the last one. In addition, there are some first publication with markets that I would go on to have repeated success with, like Factor Four Magazine and Flame Tree. In all, there’s a nice mix of pro, semi-pro, and even token acceptances here, and I have no doubt that sending well over a hundred submissions to a wide variety of markets contributed to my success.
Of course, sadly, a number of these markets, including my beloved Arcanist, have since closed or gone on indefinite hiatus. That’s definitely a reoccurring theme and one we’ll continue to see in the years to come. It’s a tough old market out there, folks.
That’s Rejectomancy Year Four in the books. This is definitely one of the years I look back on fondly, as it was definitely a year full of validation, not just in terms of short story sales, but also in other freelance writing, primarily media tie-in. In all, 2018 was just a damn good year. Five out of five stars. No notes. 🙂
Thoughts or opinions about Rejectomancy Year Four? Tell me about it in the comments.
Posted on August 28, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
Today on The Daily No, it’s another first. The rejection we’ll be discussing today is my first ever personal rejection with actual feedback from an editor. It was a momentous occasion, and the first time I really felt like I was making actual progress. What’s interesting about this rejection is that it’s the also first time I encountered the following submission truisms. One, even good stories get rejected, and, related to that, two, not every good story is a good fit for every publisher/editor.
Quick disclaimer here. I feel it necessary to once again point out that these posts are NOT call-outs. I am absolutely not taking these publications and editors to task for rejecting my work. These stories were rejected because, as I said above, they weren’t a good fit for the markets and editors I sent them to. That’s it. Full stop.
Okay, with that out of the way, let’s take a look at today’s rejection.
Rejection #7
Aeryn,
Thanks for letting us see “Night Games”. I regret to say that it’s not right for ALLEGORY.
I loved the incredible vividness of this story, and thought the ending was rather awesome. (Nothing like a vampire being staked with a baseball bat.) However, the long digressions into baseball, while interesting and well written, really slowed the pace for me. It ended up feeling like there was too much internal monologue for the bit of action the story provided.
Best of luck with this in other markets.
There’s a lot to discuss with this one, but let’s break down the rejection first. It opens with the important business, which is whether my story was accepted or not. Then, the editor graciously told me WHY the story wasn’t a good fit for them and their market, while also praising the bits they liked. They ended the rejection with a standard boilerplate closing. Good rejection. Short, succinct, and sincere. A+
So, this was my first personal rejection and the first time I had received editorial feedback on a short story. At the time, I viewed this as a major accomplishment, even if I was disappointed about the rejection. The editor did an excellent job explaining why they rejected the piece, and was careful to include language like “for me”, which I appreciated.
I will say without hesitation that “Night Games” is one of the best stories I’ve written in the twenty-some years I’ve been doing this, but it has a couple of things working against it that made it kind of a tough sell. One, it’s a vampire story, and if you think shopping a vampire story is rough in 2025, you should have tried it in 2012 and 2013 when the pushback against vampires as a response to the glut of sexy blood suckers was in full swing. Two, it’s about baseball, and I mean REALLY about baseball. If you’re not a sports fan, then sections of “Night Games” are gonna feel very tedious. I go into a lot of detail about the minutiae of pitching, hitting, how the minor leagues work, and a bunch of other deep baseball topics, and for some folks (and editors), that’s just not gonna work.
“Night Games” racked up seven rejections before I sold it to Devilfish Review and again to Pseudopod. Two more of those seven rejections were similar in content and tone to the Allegory rejection above. So this story is a great example of why you should keep submitting work you believe in and that rejections are sometimes more about editorial taste and publisher fit than the quality of your work. Again, the editors that rejected “Night Games” weren’t wrong in doing so. They were absolutely right about the story not being a good fit for their publication. I just needed to find the story the right home, and I eventually did. 🙂
Thoughts on this rejection? Tell me about it in the comments.
Posted on August 26, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
Next up on The Daily No, we’re traveling all the way back to the beginning, to the first rejection I received once I started tracking my submissions on Duotrope. Imagine, if you will, a warm spring day in Seattle, circa 2012. A baby writer waits excitedly to hear back about the perfect, wonderful story he’s submitted to a pro market that is sure to be accepted and published (it’s perfect and wonderful, remember?) only to have his hopes and dreams cruelly dashed by the unfeeling juggernaut of the publishing industry. I know; dramatic, huh? 🙂
Let’s have a look.
Rejection #1
Aeryn,
Thank you for submitting your story, “Feeding Time”, to Daily Science Fiction. Unfortunately, we have decided not to publish it. To date, we have reviewed many strong stories that we did not take. Either the fit was wrong or we’d just taken tales with a similar theme or any of a half dozen other reasons.
Best success selling this story elsewhere.
That, friends, is a sterling example of a standard form rejection from a pro market. It’s a boilerplate rejection, but a nice one, and it’s long enough that it doesn’t sound terse or brusque but not so long that it starts to feel patronizing. Like all good rejections, it gets the business out of the way first by telling you the fate of your story. Then it has a couple of lines about why it might not have been selected that are generally true. Although, in my case, the story just wasn’t good enough. I just didn’t have the experience to tell at the point. This form rejection gets an A from me.
Over the next ten years, before they went on indefinite hiatus in 2022, I sent twenty-three more submissions to DSF, all of which resulted in this exact same form letter. Look, folks, I’m a pretty good flash fiction writer, and I’ve cracked some really good markets with my flash, and I only say that because sometimes you run into a market that, for whatever reason, you and your work are just not a good fit for. That’s just how publishing works sometimes. I like to think I would have eventually cracked DSF, but I might not have, and that’s okay, too. Of the twenty-four stories I sent them, I went on to sell fourteen of them, some to other pro markets. The other ten, well, uh, see below.
All that said, I would like to apologize to the editors of DSF. I definitely sent them some stuff that was not ready for primetime in the early days of my submission efforts. “Feeding Time” was a great example of that, and they rightly and I might even say righteously rejected it. 🙂
Thoughts on this rejection? Tell me about it in the comments.
Posted on August 25, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
Year three of Rejectomancy was a bit of a wake-up call. After three straight years of increasing submissions and acceptances, I kind of fell off a cliff in 2017. It was one of those years that tests you, makes you ask the question: am I good enough to do this? As usual, the answer is not a simple yes or no, it’s always a frustrating maybe? So, let’s look at year three and see what happened.
Total stats for 2017.

I went into 2017 determined to send more submissions than I ever had, and I succeeded. Seventy-five was twenty-one more than I sent in 2016. Of course, I received nine acceptances in 2016, so if my math is right, I should have received twelve or thirteen submissions in 2017. Uh, no. That’s, unfortunately, not how publishing works, and I netted a measly SIX acceptances in 2016. That earned me a miniscule acceptance percentage of 7.4%, nowhere near the rarified 20% I had achieved the year before. I did manage to make a couple of bucks, though, so it wasn’t all bad news.
Okay, let’s look at the acceptances, then we can discuss what the hell happened.

Even though I only sold six stories in 2017, there were some very good sales in here, and three of the six would be considered pro sales. My favorite sales this year are the stories I sold to The Arcanist, a market that would continue to be a safe-haven for my dark and goofy stories for the next five years. The story “Cowtown” was, in fact, the first story The Arcanist ever published, and they would go on to publishing another fifteen of my stories before they sadly went on indefinite hiatus.
So, what happened here? Why did my submission numbers go up, but my acceptance numbers plummet? Looking back on this year through the lens of another eight years of submission experience, it’s pretty easy to see what happened. The simple answer is I started regularly submitting to pro markets, and forty-one of my seventy-five submissions went to top-tier publishers, with Apex, Daily Science Fiction, Flash Fiction Online, Clarkesworld, The Dark, and Pseudopod claiming the lion’s share of those subs. As you may have heard, those markets are kinda hard to crack, and truth be told, I send them some stories that weren’t ready for pro-publishing. So, yeah, it’s not exactly surprising that my acceptance percentage fell off a cliff. It wasn’t all bad news, of course. I did manage a couple of holds and final-round rejections from some of these big markets, and those stories I did go on to sell in the years to come.
And that’s Rejectomancy Year Three. Although my submission efforts were less successful than I’d hoped, it was a pretty good writing year overall. I wrote and published my second novel, Aftershock, as well as a slew of articles and short fiction pieces, for Privateer Press. I also started writing a novel based on my own IP that I am still shopping to this day. Not sure if that’s a good thing, though. 🙂
Thoughts or opinions about Rejectomancy Year Three? Tell me about it in the comments.
Posted on August 22, 2025 by Aeryn Rudel
Okay, I’m gonna start a new series. I’m gonna to show you one of my rejections (almost) every day for as long as either of us can stand it. I’ve got hundreds, so we should have material for YEARS. Anyway, I’ll give you all the stats on the story and submission, show you the rejection, and then talk about what we can learn from it. As always, these posts will be for educational purposes, to see what we can learn from rejections. They will absolutely NOT be some kind of childish callout for editors and publishers because they dared reject me or something equally as silly. Cool? Then let’s take a look at the first rejection.
Rejection #740
Dear Aeryn,
We appreciate the opportunity to read “Love Is Like That Sometimes,” and thank you for submitting it to us. Unfortunately, we’ve not accepted this story for publication.
You made it to the second round of submissions, which is no small feat! We publish one story a month, and we receive hundreds of excellent submissions. As a result, we turn away many stories we enjoy and admire.
I really enjoyed the creeping sense of dread that works its way into your story— it kept me riveted all the way to the end. What a brilliant ending as well, I was so conflicted over my emotions for your main character; I went from sympathy to curiosity to wondering if she did the right thing by keeping her mother and Jasper “alive” in the states they were in. Grief can be a powerful and crazed thing, for sure. Very well done.
I wish you success in publishing your piece elsewhere and hope you’ll consider submitting more work to us in the future.
Best regards,
If anyone writes nicer more thoughtful rejections than Orion’s Belt, I don’t know who it is. The editors are overwhelmingly positive and supportive, and, yeah, they’re a tough market to crack, but I’m gonna keep trying just because even their no’s make me feel pretty good about my work. Anyway, let’s break down this rejection.
One thing I really like about this rejection is how it’s formatted. It starts with the boilerplate stuff, the information every writer who receives a rejection needs to know, which just state the basics. They’re not going to publish the story. Then it goes on to tell me how far I made it into their submission process, which is such useful information, and I always appreciate it when publishers do that. Just that right there tells me the story has legs, and that I should submit it elsewhere right away (I did). Then the editor goes on to write what feels like a sincere description of the things they liked about the piece. Now, honestly, I’d have been happy with the rejection after the first two paragraphs, but getting some earnest praise for you work from an editor is always, always welcome.
The rejection ends with a boilerplate closing line that also, somehow, feels sincere, which is tough to do.
I give this rejection a solid A. No notes. 🙂
Thoughts on this rejection? Tell me about it in the comments.
